Cricket thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Location
Cheshire
It has to be a no, England won't be able to

I still concur, but crikey this is good ^_^
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
Oooer. What's happening?

Just got in from toiling in the garden expecting it to be all over ... or at least heading to a depressingly inevitable conclusion.
70 needed, 4 wickets remaining

bollocks. Stokes gone. 3 wickets remaining.

Edit 69 needed with 2 remaining. I should have stayed in the garden

Edit 69 needed with 1 remaining. What have I done?
 
Last edited:
Location
Cheshire
Oooer. What's happening?

Just got in from toiling in the garden expecting it to be all over ... or at least heading to a depressingly inevitable conclusion.
70 needed, 4 wickets remaining

bollocks. Stokes gone. 3 wickets remaining.

Edit 69 needed with 2 remaining. I should have stayed in the garden

Edit 69 needed with 1 remaining. What have I done?

Haven't you got any more gardening to do? :laugh:
 

AndyRM

XOXO
Location
North Shields
Raging about the Bairstow dismissal (despite it being perfectly legal), but the pantomime Broad put on and the sheer dismissive power of Stokes was something to behold.

Can we came back from this? Unlikely. But this series has been entertaining stuff so far, and a lot closer than people seem to think. Our top order failures are well known. Australia have been dominant in their first innings, but losing to the best Test team in the world by two wickets and 43 runs is hardly a disgrace.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I think there's a bit of hysteria about the Bairstow business. A few days ago Michael Vaughan was criticising the attitude of the England team for being too relaxed and chummy with the Aussies: "This is the Ashes. I don't want to see you chatting to them, wait til the series is over for that" (paraphrased). I think it may be symptomatic of that. Still, I doubt it's a mistake Bairstow will make again.
 
Raging about the Bairstow dismissal (despite it being perfectly legal), but the pantomime Broad put on and the sheer dismissive power of Stokes was something to behold.

Can we came back from this? Unlikely. But this series has been entertaining stuff so far, and a lot closer than people seem to think. Our top order failures are well known. Australia have been dominant in their first innings, but losing to the best Test team in the world by two wickets and 43 runs is hardly a disgrace.

Agree with all that!

We watched the highlights last night - I think I'd already heard that we'd lost, but not that it was close. SOOOO glad I watched that hour of telly, top sporting drama. :notworthy::cheers:
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
3x MCC members suspended:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66082409

I think that's the right thing to do ... but Warner+Khawaja are massive snowflakes to complain about a bit of barracking from some pensioners in blazers, whilst giving it "This is Test Cricket, mate, we're here to win, not to make friends..... etc "

I was chuckling about this, imaging the scene and what might have been said. "I say, you there. You are a frightful bounder"
 

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk
Location
52 Festive Road
3x MCC members suspended:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66082409

I think that's the right thing to do ... but Warner+Khawaja are massive snowflakes to complain about a bit of barracking from some pensioners in blazers, whilst giving it "This is Test Cricket, mate, we're here to win, not to make friends..... etc "

For Khawaja to get involved, there had to be something beyond a bit of banter and barracking.

Too easy to dismiss as snowflakes.
 
Top Bottom