That sounds like a spell from Harry Potter (that is not labelled as Hardcore so it's safe for the kids and Granny to watch).Bifidus digestivum.
In our house that became the substitute phrase for bullshit.
Last edited:
That sounds like a spell from Harry Potter (that is not labelled as Hardcore so it's safe for the kids and Granny to watch).Bifidus digestivum.
In our house that became the substitute phrase for bullshit.
I prefer the Welsh take on the microwave: popty-ping.I think that's Nigella taking the mick out of Nigella. Fair play to her. It's a mickro-wahvay in our house from henceforth.
I liked old Len on Strictly, but God he was repetitive.
"You came out there ... "
"And you gave it your all."
Every. Bloody. Contestant.
Good grief I’m getting old; I had to Google that one!Oh,
I love my holibobs
But aren’t qualified uniques one of those Victorian pedants errors that actually were used by Chaucer and/or Shakespeare? ‘Nearly Unique’ seems a reasonable way to say ‘one of a few examples’.If they do, they are in error.
This annoys me massively, but not as much as knowing I’m wrong, as both words have been used in both senses forever in English and this is another made up grammarian imposition.Less for quantities, fewer for numbers. So:
Less wine, fewer glasses.
Less sugar, fewer lumps.
Less water, fewer raindrops.
It all depends on whether you can count it or not.
[/pedant]
Good grief I’m getting old; I had to Google that one!
‘Going forward’ for ‘in the future’ or ‘from now’ has unfortunately gained a lot of traction. Also ‘gained a lot of traction’ for ‘become more common’ now I come to think of it.
Guys get thrown on bonfires on November 5th as far as I’m concerned, prior to that you can use them to beg for penniesI'm an old fashioned/conservative type,so i refuse to use the word 'guys',preferring to say blokes or chaps(British),especially since 'guys'(American) is now used to refer to females as well as males.🧐
I try to follow the rule but still feel that if more is good for uncountables and countables, less is just as capable of being the opposite for both too.This annoys me massively, but not as much as knowing I’m wrong, as both words have been used in both senses forever in English and this is another made up grammarian imposition.
I am aware I’ve used ‘forever’ in a poetic, hyperbolic sense, and that’s bound to have annoyed someone.
'reasonable'? What's reason got to do with it?But aren’t qualified uniques one of those Victorian pedants errors that actually were used by Chaucer and/or Shakespeare? ‘Nearly Unique’ seems a reasonable way to say ‘one of a few examples’.
Yes,it's a tough one addressing a group of both genders.🤔 I'd probably use 'folks'.
There was a team in a local pub quiz once calling themselves Norfolk 'n' Chance'n on a menu
As in;
fish 'n chips
egg 'n bacon
toast 'n jam
It really 'nnoys me!