thom
____
- Location
- The Borough
To move forward in cycling does require investigative journalists to ask tough questions but it can be helped by them trying to engage and construct something more than just reduced to slinging mud.Just speculating like everyone else thom
What are the options? Open the doors to all who wish to have a look, or control what information you give out by relying on a group of journos(who will fault find and compare to Armstrong anyway) to request it specifically?
I see a bit more control over information with the latter. Not that I'm suggesting SKY are hiding anything.
These press conferences for Froome must feel like a form of torture - every day the riders put themselves through hell on a bike and then they are sat in front of the glare of the world's media and are offered up the same accusation of cheating and lies. It isn't very imaginative is it ? I actually think the UCI have a role here to step in and mediate in a sense - cycling's image continues to suffer while very valid questions are asked that as yet the sport has not found a way to address. Brailsford seems to be giving more leadership than the UCI...