Hont
Guru
- Location
- Bromsgrove
But he's 4 years away from peak... Froome is at peak cycling age
Possibly, but every athlete is different and remember Laurent Fignon pissed all over Hinault aged only 23.
But he's 4 years away from peak... Froome is at peak cycling age
It was clearly in defence of Quintana. Some have mentioned they believe he has been too strong too quick. I have offered an explanation as to why he climbs so well. It doesn't seem obvious to everyone.If that was the case then his TT wouldn't be so woeful. You're right about the power/weight ratio, though it is somewhat stating the obvious. But the lighter you are, the lower FTP that you can reasonably expect, which is also stating the obvious.
Either way none of this speculation tells us ANYTHING at all about either Quintana or Froome taking PEDs.
It was clearly in defence of Quintana. Some have mentioned they believe he has been too strong too quick. I have offered an explanation as to why he climbs so well. It doesn't seem obvious to everyone.
I am cynical too. But the kind of dope that could produce 8-minute stage wins did not exist during Merckx's career....Merckx could have been doping.
And if Froome uses his exceptional CP25 (or CP20, or CP15) in the final phase of the stage, his teammates, trained in the same way, use theirs somewhat earlier. When they reach the end of their period of available very high power they drop off the pace and hand over to the next teammate.Cheers crackle. A good read.
THIS, I can begin to accept
Kerrison says that the doping era caused road cyclingcoaching standards to become retarded and Sky are simply exploiting the knowledge gap.
I am cynical too. But the kind of dope that could produce 8-minute stage wins did not exist during Merckx's career.
This is quite possibly what Sky do so well. What makes it so impressive from Froome's performance is that he keeps up with all of his teammates during their CP15/20/25's and then still has the gas to go again over the top of everyone else. The guys working on the front are only pacing, not drafting - unless climbing on a windy day and into a headwind. I don't believe this was the case?And if Froome uses his exceptional CP25 (or CP20, or CP15) in the final phase of the stage, his teammates, trained in the same way, use theirs somewhat earlier. When they reach the end of their period of available very high power they drop off the pace and hand over to the next teammate.
Which is just what other teams try to do... but in a less structured, defined, tactically effective way. It is consistent with their approach that the Sky sports science support team would have interpreted, made more formal, and optimised, something which other teams with overall contenders do - but do far less effectively.
I think that's why he is the last man in the line. He was very impressive on Ventoux.This is quite possibly what Sky do so well. What makes it so impressive from Froome's performance is that he keeps up with all of his teammates during their CP15/20/25's and then still has the gas to go again over the top of everyone else. The guys working on the front are only pacing, not drafting - unless climbing on a windy day and into a headwind. I don't believe this was the case?
So really whilst Sky may have been working on this 25 minute effort for everyone, it is really only Froome who is capable of doing the damage he inflicted on Mout Ventoux.
I wonder if Pom Bears are good food to improve fitness, just had my 2nd packet of the day.