StuAff
Silencing his legs regularly
- Location
- Portsmouth
I did say 'making them look like'. Just like you did.Why is that when you voice doubt that you suddenly become a pariah? People start reading stuff in that you've not said. I refer you to the post I made above.
"MTFUd"?? So, what, nobody else trains either?
Pariah? Er, no. See that legal principle again. You have your doubts, fair enough. But without evidence, that's all they are.
If someone considers Froome or AN Other is doping, it is up to them to demonstrate that. Sky may or may not release their power data at some point. They don't have to, quite right too, and they're certainly not going to help out the other teams by doing that right now. M Vayer's figures have attracted widespread scepticism, not least because he does not have access to that data. He is in effect guestimating. With the benefit of hindsight, and more importantly overwhelming evidence, LA's doping was proven. No evidence that Froome is doping, not yet. Nothing untoward in his performances. For all the much-vaunted strategy, the marginal gains, a big part of the reason Sky's performance in 2012 was so dominant was that they never had a bad day, Sitsou's retirement notwithstanding. The same could most definitely not be said of the rival teams. Cuddles looked completely worn out on more than one stage. Nibali had nothing more than the odd little nibble (pun intended). This year has clearly been much harder on Sky. Weaker performances from some of their team, crashes, retirements, others upping their game at least a bit. It was always likely to be that way. Froome's performances before the Tour at least matched Wiggo's run last year, and as with Wiggo last year, he's stayed strong when rivals haven't. Sky's methods are clearly working, at least for their team leader.
