Not being familiar with the County Court, I'm wondering what level of representation the parking company would come to court with.
Would that be dependent on whether or not the claim was being challenged ?
The parking company will usually use a provincial solicitor, and thereby hangs another tail.
Some solicitors will file the claim in a court local to them, which could be anywhere in the country.
As a lay respondent, Accy is entitled to have the case transferred to a court near to him.
Worth doing for the convenience factor, but also because if the solicitor is in, say, Maidstone, the parking company has to decide whether to pay to send someone half way across the country, or pay to get the case covered locally.
Both options making them slightly less likely to pursue it.
I don’t think it has been mentioned yet, but if you do take this to court where you will lose, you will get a CCJ against you on your credit file, this can have quite an impact on various financial areas in your life.
This just adds another reason to pay, although the main reason is that it is the right thing to do and at little cost to yourself as well. Something I would call a no brainer.
I'm afraid you are also falling for the parking company's scare tactic.
An unsatisfied county court judgment will have an impact on credit rating, but Accy can apply for, say, seven days to pay so the case is settled almost before judgment is entered against him.
All of which is based on the company taking the case to court, and Accy losing, neither of which is in any way certain.
We disagree on this being the right thing to do.
I'm not keen on a private parking company, or any private company, fining the citizen because there are no checks and balances which there would be in the criminal court.
Also, the charge is nothing other than a penalty.
Ninety quid for 30 minutes in an otherwise free car park is, in my view, 'unconscionable', although I accept a Supreme Court judge disagrees with me.