Motorsports Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Cerdic

Senior Member
Well, the Russian GP has gone down the pan. No surprise there.

Haas ran in plain white livery today in pre-season testing. Gunther Steiner was quoted as saying that the position of Nikita Mazepin in the team is under review.

If Mazepin gets the grand order of the boot, F1 will lose the least talented driver ever to grace the series.

Least talented ‘ever’? Ahem…Taki Inoue…?
 

icowden

Veteran
Location
Surrey
If Mazepin gets the grand order of the boot, F1 will lose the least talented driver ever to grace the series.
It'll be his dad's money that Gunther misses most...
 

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk
Location
52 Festive Road
Dad's money will be all over the place. I was listening to a radio programme yesterday featuring a guy who specialises in London Oligarch Tours, which are a bit like the Hollywood Stars tours you get - just touring street after street of Russian-owned properties, all owned via untraceable anonymous companies.
 

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
Any early observations from the 3 days of testing?
Hopefully Ferrari and McLaren are back to near their best.
The porpoising looked a little worrying on the high speed straights and seemed to catch everyone out.
 

FishFright

More wheels than sense
Any early observations from the 3 days of testing?
Hopefully Ferrari and McLaren are back to near their best.
The porpoising looked a little worrying on the high speed straights and seemed to catch everyone out.

Porpoising was a problem with the earlier period of ground effects too and won't take long to sort out.
I believe its due to the floor flexing at the rear of the floor, Mclaren's strut solution points this way to me even though the strut won't be race legal.

The shakedown times are pretty much unreadable due to having no clue to the programmes the teams were running. Also the glory runs on the C5 tyres can be excluded.

I think the Bahrain tests will show a lot better picture where the teams stand.

I do wonder if any of the major teams get it well wrong in race conditions because the cap could effectively wipe out their season.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 1258

Guest
We'll only know who's where when qualifying and racing begins in ernest, these preseason tests are useful to the teams but don't tell us a lot.
 
OP
OP
Reynard

Reynard

Guru
Porpoising was a problem with the earlier period of ground effects too and won't take long to sort out.
I believe its due to the floor flexing at the rear of the floor, Mclaren's strut solution points this way to me even though the strut won't be race legal.

Not really - it's basically the airflow stalling, which disrupts the laminar flow underneath the car. Given a racing car is effectively an upside down aircraft, this explanation might be useful:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stall_(fluid_dynamics)

I only did this to an undergrad level I'm afraid, and it was one heck of a long time ago. I preferred to break things in a lab.^_^
 

FishFright

More wheels than sense
Not really - it's basically the airflow stalling, which disrupts the laminar flow underneath the car. Given a racing car is effectively an upside down aircraft, this explanation might be useful:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stall_(fluid_dynamics)

I only did this to an undergrad level I'm afraid, and it was one heck of a long time ago. I preferred to break things in a lab.^_^

The teams are saying that the floor is flexing too far downwards towards its rear edge ( in front of the rear wheels) which is causing the airflow to stall underneath the car, the car lifts allowing the flow to reattach and then the downforce pushes it back down too far causing another stall - rinse and repeat.

A similar thing happens when the rear diffusers are ran too low . The FIA raised the diffuser stakes a couple of years to stop the teams using it to lower the drag on the straights.
Interestingly the game Assetto Corsa models this a very basic way, a simple loss of rear downforce if hit box of the diffuser touches the track, Stefano the AC code guru explained it on a youtube stream because people were calling it a bug.
 
D

Deleted member 1258

Guest
The teams are saying that the floor is flexing too far downwards towards its rear edge ( in front of the rear wheels) which is causing the airflow to stall underneath the car, the car lifts allowing the flow to reattach and then the downforce pushes it back down too far causing another stall - rinse and repeat.

A similar thing happens when the rear diffusers are ran too low . The FIA raised the diffuser stakes a couple of years to stop the teams using it to lower the drag on the straights.
Interestingly the game Assetto Corsa models this a very basic way, a simple loss of rear downforce if hit box of the diffuser touches the track, Stefano the AC code guru explained it on a youtube stream because people were calling it a bug.

The car is squatting on its suspension as the level of downforce rises and that is changing the angle of attack causing a stall, once its stalled the car rises changing the angle of attack and creating downforce again till it stalls again.
 
OP
OP
Reynard

Reynard

Guru
It's a phenomenon that doesn't really happen with the old style flat-bottomed cars - that's why the flat bottoms were introduced for 1983 and have existed in various iterations since.

Like with an aircraft wing, the underbody of ground effect cars are curved and sculpted in such a way to accelerate the airflow underneath, and thus sucking the car to the track surface by lowering the pressure under the floor.

Back in the day, the stalling issue was overcome by active and adjustable suspension.
 

Similar threads

Top Bottom