They reduced the price NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Don't be one of those dudes who wears a rucksack even if it is just for food -it's 100 miles it's not a Transcontinental expedition. put your food in your pockets or your seat pack take a couple of bottles and that's it. when the speed starts ramping up you will regret that rucksack believe me. rucksacks are for commuting or shopping.end of. I will be going for sub five hours 15 minutes it is achievable some of you guys will manage it also-400bhp and hacienda defo well within your capabilities.I'll be carrying most of my food in my £9 Tesco 2 litre hydration pack
So will they defo be serving a hearty full English when we arrive (and will we be able to get in the door? I'm guessing there may be a few other cyclists with the same idea!).
Two 1 litre bottles are more than enough for 50 miles.if u need more than this there is something wrong with you.stop making excuses for carrying the bl**dy thing.
Well if you think you need to carry four spare tubes you are frankly an idiot,sorry. why don't you take some hints from people such as club cyclists who regularly ride long distances - you don't see any of them with rucksacks.
Who knew the humble rucksack could cause so much offence.
yeah,maybe i am being a bit harsh. But come on, I'm sure you wanna look the part, and you wanna be the part. And you won't be while you're weaing one of these. Besides which it is a totally unnecessary piece of baggage as you can get evrything you need in pockets,seatpack and boitle cages.People wear rucksacks as a kind of comfort blanket usually because they are intimidated by any kind of distance riding. Leave fhem at home.They are for commuters and mtb'ers only.Who knew the humble rucksack could cause so much offence.
