Discrimination and Loss of "freedom of movement" for poor and disabled

[classic33]

Oh dear god, YACF would rip him to shreds.

Don't go bringing religion into this thread. He may want it excluding!
From what I know he doesn't believe in him anyway.

 

[black'n'yellow]

Oh dear god, YACF would rip him to shreds.

someone send him a link to veloriders - that won't be pretty....

 

[Oldspice]

[QUOTE 2096635, member: 45"]Right, remind me what he said again......[/quote]

The mayor does not believe there is a shark in the water, so he is not going to close the beach

 

[classic33]

[QUOTE 2096635, member: 45"]Right, remind me what he said again......[/quote]
See post 531 on previous page. If you you think you're upto reading it from the start, again. Not partway through, remember that!

He didn't post last Saturday either.

07:36 Sunday for his next post on here.

 

[Cyclopathic]

I now believe he's gone. BikeRadar & YACF, here he comes.

Was it something we said?

 

[Cyclopathic]

See post 531 on previous page. If you you think you're upto reading it from the start, again. Not partway through, remember that!

He didn't post last Saturday either.

07:36 Sunday for his next post on here.

Is something going on do you think? Some sort of shenanigins perhaps?

 

[Cyclopathic]

I'm gonna miss that guy.

 

[on the road]

It was good entertainment

Looks like the show's over

 

[MrJamie]

I was going to post a Bambi video in jest, but it was too sad

 

[classic33]

It was good entertainment

Looks like the show's over

6(that magic number again) hours 20 to go

 

[classic33]

I was going to post a Bambi video in jest, but it was too sad

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6E2hYDIFDIU
More fitting I think

 

[Oldspice]

Go Vegan.

 

[asterix]

This topic is going round and round in circles, it will never reach a satisfactory conclusion, and I suspect is a complete waste of everyones time and energy, especially the OP's.

Not mine, I haven't replied to it..

Ooops, damn!

 

[classic33]

For those, including disabled rider, who may have thought that what I was saying as having done, wasn't. I offer some proof that it wasn't all talk.

Phonecalls, who said what to who & when, cannot be placed as easily on here. But my efforts were serious attempts at trying to find out/help. You may not like the answers given, but there's more than me tried to help out.
What I've posted on here is as was said/done & now its upto disabled rider, who doesn't always sign in, but does watch, to take it further

I was hoping for a response before this thread died, but such is the nature of trying to get an answer in a short period of time(not always possible) I'm posting now.

 

[classic33]

RE: "Discimination" against disabled cyclists‏

From:
Mitchell, Tim (DOT) (Tim.Mitchell@state.mn.us)
Sent:
15 October 2012 16:01:35
To:

Cc:
Jorenby, Kristin (DOT) (kristin.jorenby@state.mn.us)
Thank you very much for your inquiry.
First, I would like to clarify your question. In the title you note that this was in regard to discrimination against disabled cyclists. Did you intend for this to be in the literal sense? If so, we will need to coordinate your concerns with our Affirmative Action Office.
If not, then the answer to your question is relatively straight forward. In Minnesota, state law allows bicyclists to travel on any roadway with the exception of controlled access highways (visualize one of our interstates).
Specific to your question, most of U.S. Highway 52 is open to bicycling. There are specific stretches in the Twin Cities area that bicycling would be restricted, as well as a stretch through the City of Rochester.
I hope this assists you. Please let me know if you have more specific questions.
tm
From:
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:29 PM
To: Geschwind, Lynnette (DOT)
Subject: "Discimination" against disabled cyclists
Trying to find out what the legal posistion is with regards cycling on the pavements in Minnesota by someone who feels that the roads are not safe to cycle on.
What restricts/prevents cyclists from using highway 52. Is it down to the speed of the traffic, similar to the motorways over here. Or was it never designed to take cyclists from the start.
I will say that this is coming from the UK, , which explains the wording used.

Picture posted isn't clear enough. Text of message posted hear.