disabled rider
Regular
Oh, and although I'm fortunate enough to be able bodied and well, I know a lot of people with varying degrees of disability who cycle, sometimes with major adaptations to their bikes or trikes, some without. I know a few who are much more mobile on bikes than off them. I don't know any who feel the need to take to the pavement - indeed, the barriers on many cyclepaths mean that they are happier using the road, where they know they will be unhindered. This is all in the UK, of course, and I have no experience of the US.
To the OP: If you want a reasonable discussion, you have to get to the point quicker. If you'd posted something along the lines of "I'm cyclist in the US. I have various disabilities and health problems that mean I feel safer on the sidewalk than the road, but I'm being penalised for riding there. Is this fair?" then I suspect we'd all have got to the point sooner. The point being that, sorry, if that's the rule, that's the rule. There are ways to make riding on the road safer for you, even in the US, but you seem to have closed your mind to changes in your riding technique, or physical aids like mirrors - both of which would help you, despite your opinion.
We all suffer from lousy driving, but unless we get a full, working, segregated cycle network, we have to use the system we have, and campaign to make it work. Running away to the pavement will make it worse for everyone, long term.
I would agree with you under current rules.
Going to the pave for slow moving disabled, isn't bad if they follow ped rules. We get into trouble when we try to use the street rules on the sidewalks. like moving faster than a jog in high traffic ped areas.
The most congested area here, I have been during rush hour. When I ride at speed of pedestrian traffic none of us had issues as far as I know. No one has said anything. But then many of them know me as the "guy with the black cat". Service animal advocate before they changed the definition to exclude everyone except those that could use dogs. even excluding monkeys which can perform tasks dogs can not. One of the times I stopped to ask an officer a question, not a word about me being there.
Guess what it boils down too:
Smokers didn't like the fact they lost their right to smoke in the building when they were not being considerate of other people needs. So they got kicked outside. Since they got their panties in a bundle they are lashing out to who ever even comes near them. They don't care their actions is really in a medical sense harming those around them.
Not sure where they can justify telling me to ride the street when they themselves are breaking 2 laws. loitering/blocking a thoroughfare. and violating constitutional rights of other people that move past them on said public sidewalks. We have freedom that only extends to another person face. Poisoning someone else direct air, violates that freedom of the other, by causing medical health problems and breathing problems.
which reminds me I need to go so I can get up in the morning to go to city hall and see what the status of changing policy is if they will do it or not.
.Disabled Rider