That explains so much.
My daughter's previous driving instructor told her she should disregard cyclists as they aren't registered (true) don't have insurance (not always true) and "don't pay road tax and so have no rights to be on the road" (chortle)
My daughter now has a new driving instructor. I wonder how your driving instructor's advice plays itself out on the roads with those who don't also cycle or ride a motorbike.
I think you miss-understand what I'm recounting.
My instructors point is, sooner or later, being on the road on any vehicle is a risk and it is one that you take when choosing your route, your time of journey and your positioning. What she was meaning is, you are waiting to pull out of a side road and it's constant traffic, a gap emerges and you have to calculate the risk since there is an element of the unknown. in this situation the risk is less on the bike than in the car, the bike is smaller, lighter and accelerates into the gap meaning I can take it, in the car I assess the risk and decide the gap is too small, on the bike in the wet I decide not to take the gap as I could slip and cause a car to hit me.
my instructor was trying, and succeeding to teach me to think for myself, not to just take a gap because it is there.
Her advice to my brother two years previous had been different but effective for him instead of advice being from a standard script.
I have taken gaps that were big enough to get a van out, pulled out, matched the speed of the vehicle in front (with a safe braking distance) and found the car behind me be right up my back bumper, having sped up simply because I dared to fit myself into a distance between cars the length of a bendy bus, plenty of space in a 30 limit. A calculated risk since decisions on the road require people to be predictable or continue as they are.