So vain!I'm with The Claud on this. And anyway, who really want's to go cycling looking like a big bag of hi-vizzy custard?
So vain!
I think you miss-understand what I'm recounting.
My instructors point is, sooner or later, being on the road on any vehicle is a risk and it is one that you take when choosing your route, your time of journey and your positioning. What she was meaning is, you are waiting to pull out of a side road and it's constant traffic, a gap emerges and you have to calculate the risk since there is an element of the unknown. in this situation the risk is less on the bike than in the car, the bike is smaller, lighter and accelerates into the gap meaning I can take it, in the car I assess the risk and decide the gap is too small, on the bike in the wet I decide not to take the gap as I could slip and cause a car to hit me.
I'm ill, so I claim immunity... actually that's impossible because I caught it first...2207850 said:1) Bet we haven't.
2) So anyone can come on here and preach at others about how they should live and in order not to upset them nobody questions it?
Hi-viz doth offend mine eye.
Low sun? you need contrast. Contrast in that context = black.
Why is folk wearing black such a problem for you?
They didn't have colour back then....They are both wearing black. That just won't do.
Sam Browne belt, my weapon of choice, when I need one. I still think it says two wheeler, rather than dustman, bloke walking in Hiviz or whatever. That's cooler than mine though. I got mine free with 12 lard wrappers about 25 years ago.I prefer monochrome myself
No cyclists in black today