newts
Veteran
- Location
- Isca Dumnoniorum
I agree he had a strange action but nothing as bad as Malinga, his action should have been banned in my eyes.
I feel that the icc were afraid to ban Malinga's action to keep the peace.
I agree he had a strange action but nothing as bad as Malinga, his action should have been banned in my eyes.
I agree he had a strange action but nothing as bad as Malinga, his action should have been banned in my eyes.
Do you two actually know the Laws on illegal action?I feel that the icc were afraid to ban Malinga's action to keep the peace.
Do you two actually know the Laws on illegal action?
I still think he chucked it.
And even if he wasn’t technically a chucker his action was so exaggerated to basically be as good as chucking it.
His success was down to the fact that batsmen had no experience of playing against a similar bowler on very spin friendly pitches.
I rate Warne as a better bowler.
I read it many times when this case was in the news & the ICC kept going at it until they found coucil that would interpet the laws to match the way they wanted it to pan out. The 15deg of elbow straightening after the bowling arm is above the shoulder was written in to justify this. It meant you could bowl with a bent arm as long as it didn't straighten more than 15 deg.
The ICC could have queried the elbow above shoulder part of the rule in Malinga's case, his elbow is never above during the delivery of the ball in a classical bowling stance. His action is sling, which according to the governing body is now permitted.
RIGHT: I ADMIT, i haven't read the rules recently. ... Is underarm now banned?
Speaking of bowling rules.
At lunch on TMS I learnt that you can’t be out if the ball bounces twice from the bowler before you hit it, as it’s now a no ball.
21.1.2 Underarm bowling shall not be permitted except by special agreement before the match.