Surprised of some of the criteria for allocating the vaccine. NHS non patient facing versus for example teachers?
Assume you mean the JCVI priority list and the criteria used to decide on it.
Please be assured considerable consultation was undertaken to get the definitions of the NHS (plus) workers who should be in Group 2 'right'. And don't be distracted by aberrations of NHS and other people working in hospitals (say) who were pulled in last thing of an evening to just make sure no dose was wasted. There is now very clear direction to have short notice waiting list available to soak up any 'surplus' at the end of each day.
No doubt they are looking at the merits of certain
employment groups getting the vaccine before others in their age cohort. But the current policy (and expectation) is that this will be only
after Groups 1-9 have been vaccinated.
Besides teachers (but remember the mantra that schools are relatively 'safe' and, relative to others fora, not high in the list of transmission mechanisms) prison officers and police officers have a fair shout, oh and bus drivers and taxi drivers. Perhaps others can flesh out a list and we can try and put them in CycleChat priority order?
From a vulnerability to serious illness and death PoV (and please recall that's the driver informing JCVI's judgement) prioritising/targeting
BAME communities and workers would also seem to have considerable merit.
Finally, shouldn't we be prioritising
men over women? I can't remember the figures off hand but the threat of this disease to 50-55 year old men is similar to 55-60 year old women. So in Groups 7,8 and 9, move the men up one group (or the women down one). (My answer is 'no' btw: too many disadvantages.