Find Out Now survey (55k persons): the (age/sex defined) group most likely to refuse the vaccine is currently 18-34 year-old women: 25% v general population's 18% (latter figure seems high cf other surveys).
Think this msn article is a good appraisal of the concerns and facts/evidence/lack of evidence on the likely/possible effect of vaccination on fertility.
Article covers everything but I thought this was a point well worth making:
"There is no reason to expect [a COVID-19 vaccine to have] an effect on fertility, specific research would've been done if there were a plausible reason to expect this being a problem. Instead, the risk of COVID-19 affecting your fertility is far greater." Dr Karan Rajan NHS surgeon, and lecturer at ICL
Just curious but are care home staff vaccinated at their place of work along with the residents?
In reality, the difference of a couple of weeks in the first vaccination is completely irrelevant. What counts is how quickly the thing is stuffed into the arms of very large numbers of people. I'd put decent money on that happening more quickly in Germany than in the UK.
That's an operationally very difficult problem to solve using the central dictat tools we're trying to impose on a health system that is run very locally.
Let's talk again in a couple of months when there is some robust data rather than political spin.
They need to be stretching but achievable.
We've had nine months of Johnson over-promising and under-delivering. Why should we believe him now?
This stretch is utterly ludicrous. It is ridiculous. It is a figment of the imagination of a few advisors in Whitehall who have never had to deal with the messy reality of actually getting drugs into people's arms.
Predicting the success or otherwise of something that nobody has ever done before is always going to be a challenge. I'm just glad, as I'm sure everyone is, that we have achieved the stretch target. Hopefully there won't be a collective exhalation and a reduction in the daily rate and instead we continue to get the vaccines into arms asaphttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2...irst-covid-jab-to-four-most-vulnerable-groups
" The UK government has reached its target of offering at least first vaccinations to the four groups of people in the UK seen as most vulnerable to coronavirus by mid-February, it has announced. "
So much for the sceptics like ...errr... me. Some of these comments really haven't lasted very well, have they?
My view is everyone should be vaccinated provided they do not have a health condition which prevents this. I am not advocating forced vaccination.What's your thoughts on the BAME folks apparently refusing the jab, considering many work in the care home industry, whether those have refused I'm unsure.
I think where the vaccination programme has succeeded when other initiatives, like test and trace have failed is largely down to the use of public sector infrastructure which has a proven track record of delivery as opposed to services being contracted out to the private sector. Vaccination is the business of general practice and wider primary care. That's what GPs do and they've shown why it made sense to put them at the centre of this.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...irst-covid-jab-to-four-most-vulnerable-groups
" The UK government has reached its target of offering at least first vaccinations to the four groups of people in the UK seen as most vulnerable to coronavirus by mid-February, it has announced. "
So much for the sceptics like ...errr... me. Some of these comments really haven't lasted very well, have they?
I’m with you on that if the vaccine prevents spread. The same folk complaining about freedom to do what they want , don’t want the vaccine neither . Very strange behaviour really.My view is everyone should be vaccinated provided they do not have a health condition which prevents this. I am not advocating forced vaccination.
In my view we all have a responsibility to ourselves, those we interact with socially (in the broadest possible sense) and society as a whole. To refuse the vaccine is irresponsible and a threat to one's own health and those we interact with.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...irst-covid-jab-to-four-most-vulnerable-groups
" The UK government has reached its target of offering at least first vaccinations to the four groups of people in the UK seen as most vulnerable to coronavirus by mid-February, it has announced. "
So much for the sceptics like ...errr... me. Some of these comments really haven't lasted very well, have they?
I await confirmation that this is "offered" in the Boris sense of in the arms and not the usual dictionary sense,
That's what GPs do and they've shown why it made sense to put them at the centre of this.
While great, 15m was not the target. It was a particular 15m. Delivery to the willing and able in priority groups is what interests me and, yes, I am slightly suspicious of the lack of detail on this on https://www.gov.uk/search/all?level...=news_and_communications&order=updated-newest but, you know, won't get fooled again.The Sun's jab-o-meter is showing 15m jabs, so it absolutely must be 15m administered.
While great, 15m was not the target. It was a particular 15m.