Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
So really show you care for them and stay at home.
It's simple if you just can't the bothered then people will die even maybe you.
You do no-one any favours pushing that unrealistic message. Some must go out to work, building medical kit or delivering other essentials. Others must go out because of the collapse of delivery services under the strain of increased demand. Yet more must go out for life-sustaining exercise. Implying that any of these are because they "can't be bothered" is offensive and unhelpful. Please stick to promoting the rules, not an incorrect simplified message, and concentrate your fire on those breaking the rules, like leaving isolation early, shaking hands or weekending in holiday homes - and maybe stuff done by people not in the governments too!
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
You do no-one any favours pushing that unrealistic message. Some must go out to work, building medical kit or delivering other essentials. Others must go out because of the collapse of delivery services under the strain of increased demand. Yet more must go out for life-sustaining exercise. Implying that any of these are because they "can't be bothered" is offensive and unhelpful. Please stick to promoting the rules, not an incorrect simplified message, and concentrate your fire on those breaking the rules, like leaving isolation early, shaking hands or weekending in holiday homes - and maybe stuff done by people not in the governments too!

I think you're inferring something that he didn't express. The phrase was "if you just can't be bothered" and my reading of that is that he is excluding those who need to be circulating.
 

MarkF

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
I agree mark but the government given advice is against the experts (scientists advice) "But the strategy is more controversial among scientists.

Some support the government, believing that it's better to bring in tighter controls only when they're needed.

Others fear the country is blindly heading for a cliff edge.

Professor Cecilia Soderberg-Naucler, speaking in her laboratory in the Karolinska Institute, fears many will die as a result of what she sees as risks being taken by the establishment.


But she claims the dissenting view is being ignored."

So who's expert advice are the Swedish government following?

That of the national epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell. I've read the opposition to his opinions too, but what resonates with me is his belief that we too late and now we are just "pushing" the problem along. Either way, lessons will be have been learnt for the future.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
Swiss news: mask wearing obligatory outdoors in Lombardy, discussion of whether it's pointless given lack of evidence, Swiss stock market nervous, car sales falling, summary of various international news already discussed here including Boris hospitalisation, further suspensions of sports
 
The point is not just that they are wrong, but that they are cherrypicked very small numbers.
Not only that but when you combine exponential growth and a significant lag between a case being confirmed and its resolution, the difference in percentage between total deaths/total cases on a given day and actual mortality rate is unintuitively large.
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
I think it's needing a ventilator in ICU where your chances are low.

More data is released each day now, I'll post some tomorrow. Given it's ultra densely populated area, with it's multi generational housing, l'd guess only a small % of people who think they are infected, or are infected, would actually want/choose to go to the hospital right now.

The number of cases is where it’s got serious enough to reach hospital. If you compare deaths to cases it’s 10%. The figures are saying 10% of those who are serious enough to reach hospital with Covid19 are dying.
 

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
Not only that but when you combine exponential growth and a significant lag between a case being confirmed and its resolution, the difference in percentage between total deaths/total cases on a given day and actual mortality rate is unintuitively large.

Absolutely. Plus, different people mean different things by "mortality rate"

Thes a really good discussion here, doubtless more up to date data would change the numbers.

https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#what-do-we-know-about-the-risk-of-dying-from-covid-19

Overall case fatality rate estimated in the region 12-24x higher than flu

Covid-19-CFR-by-age-vs.-US-Seasonal-Flu-3-800x550.png
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
Im no virologist or barely know what im talking about but it seems bizarre that 73% of those with no obvious symptoms actual had some pheumonia.
Not really. ‘The usual Symptoms’ ( high temperature, fatigue coughing) are caused mostly by the immune system response. If there isn’t much of an immune system, there will be less of ‘the usual symptoms’ and the virus will get to its favoured target ( the lungs ) relatively unabated, so “no symptoms shown, but damage to the lungs apparent” is not that surprising. It’s also pretty much par for the course, on that type of cruise ship / cruise, where there will be an unusually high concentration of people in the highest risk groups ( elderly / infirm / mixture of both ).
 
Top Bottom