You do no-one any favours pushing that unrealistic message. Some must go out to work, building medical kit or delivering other essentials. Others must go out because of the collapse of delivery services under the strain of increased demand. Yet more must go out for life-sustaining exercise. Implying that any of these are because they "can't be bothered" is offensive and unhelpful. Please stick to promoting the rules, not an incorrect simplified message, and concentrate your fire on those breaking the rules, like leaving isolation early, shaking hands or weekending in holiday homes - and maybe stuff done by people not in the governments too!So really show you care for them and stay at home.
It's simple if you just can't the bothered then people will die even maybe you.
I've specifically addressed the poverty issue you brought up in that very message.Moms and Dads die of poverty as well
What's wrong with that? Council grass-cutters are still working here. Stuff hasn't stopped growing because of a pandemic.Now the "white van" men have turned up next door to cut the grass.
Just what's wrong with people?
You do no-one any favours pushing that unrealistic message. Some must go out to work, building medical kit or delivering other essentials. Others must go out because of the collapse of delivery services under the strain of increased demand. Yet more must go out for life-sustaining exercise. Implying that any of these are because they "can't be bothered" is offensive and unhelpful. Please stick to promoting the rules, not an incorrect simplified message, and concentrate your fire on those breaking the rules, like leaving isolation early, shaking hands or weekending in holiday homes - and maybe stuff done by people not in the governments too!
Even with these updated nr mortality is that of flu
Likewise. I think you're adding caveats that weren't there.I think you're inferring something that he didn't express. The phrase was "if you just can't be bothered" and my reading of that is that he is excluding those who need to be circulating.
I agree mark but the government given advice is against the experts (scientists advice) "But the strategy is more controversial among scientists.
Some support the government, believing that it's better to bring in tighter controls only when they're needed.
Others fear the country is blindly heading for a cliff edge.
Professor Cecilia Soderberg-Naucler, speaking in her laboratory in the Karolinska Institute, fears many will die as a result of what she sees as risks being taken by the establishment.
But she claims the dissenting view is being ignored."
So who's expert advice are the Swedish government following?
Not only that but when you combine exponential growth and a significant lag between a case being confirmed and its resolution, the difference in percentage between total deaths/total cases on a given day and actual mortality rate is unintuitively large.The point is not just that they are wrong, but that they are cherrypicked very small numbers.
I think it's needing a ventilator in ICU where your chances are low.
More data is released each day now, I'll post some tomorrow. Given it's ultra densely populated area, with it's multi generational housing, l'd guess only a small % of people who think they are infected, or are infected, would actually want/choose to go to the hospital right now.
Not only that but when you combine exponential growth and a significant lag between a case being confirmed and its resolution, the difference in percentage between total deaths/total cases on a given day and actual mortality rate is unintuitively large.
Absolutely. Plus, different people mean different things by "mortality rate"
Thes a really good discussion here, doubtless more up to date data would change the numbers.
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#what-do-we-know-about-the-risk-of-dying-from-covid-19
Overall case fatality rate estimated in the region 12-24x higher than flu
View attachment 512955
Interesting those graphs don’t break them both down into the same age brackets.
Not really. ‘The usual Symptoms’ ( high temperature, fatigue coughing) are caused mostly by the immune system response. If there isn’t much of an immune system, there will be less of ‘the usual symptoms’ and the virus will get to its favoured target ( the lungs ) relatively unabated, so “no symptoms shown, but damage to the lungs apparent” is not that surprising. It’s also pretty much par for the course, on that type of cruise ship / cruise, where there will be an unusually high concentration of people in the highest risk groups ( elderly / infirm / mixture of both ).Im no virologist or barely know what im talking about but it seems bizarre that 73% of those with no obvious symptoms actual had some pheumonia.