Coronavirus outbreak

[PK99]

In the context of bloody cvid19 it is, the jab doesn't stop the flu, there are still 000000's of deaths and a lock down would stop a vast majority of them but the don't lock down do they.

Enough already!

I'm breaking a golden rule >>>>> Ignore

 

[RecordAceFromNew]

The effect of

is


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE68xVXf8Kw

 

[Tanis8472]

Enough already!

I'm breaking a golden rule >>>>> Ignore

Better to be out in the open to be challenged! Surely?

 

[Rusty Nails]

Better to be out in the open to be challenged! Surely?

Out in the open and at least two metres away.

 

[roubaixtuesday]

the graph presented earlier in this thread flu deaths in NY run at 125+ a week 52 weeks a year. When you look at those sort of figures then it is hard not to wonder why flu is ignored (in context with the current situation) and why cv19 is being treated so extremely

Just as a reminder for onlookers. He's the graph:

It's blindingly obvious why cv19 is being treated so seriously.

But I guess it just goes to show that there are none so blind as fat fools who will not see.

 

[RecordAceFromNew]

Today's (yesterday's) figures:

209 (260) dead, 2433 (2546) new cases, only 6961 (6999) tested, 35% (36.4%) positive.

 

[Mike_P]

Everyone in employment has, or should have, an National Insurance number which could be used to identify workers who have had CV19 and okay to return to work.

 

[roubaixtuesday]

Today's (yesterday's) figures:

209 (260) dead, 2433 (2546) new cases, only 6961 (6999) tested, 35% (36.4%) positive.

It's a great relief that yesterday's record not surpassed. Am I right in thinking Sunday figures have generally been lower throughout, or did I imagine that?

 

[kingrollo]

Covid19 has an estimated mortality rate or 1%, but puts a much larger number (19%) in hospital.

So for every 19 admissions with CV, 18 will survive if they receive appropriate treatment (in many cases, weeks of treatment).
But CV is overwhelming healthcare systems. Once the hospital beds are full, how many of those 18 will also die from lack of available treatment?


That's the key difference between CV and flu. Flu only stresses healthcare systems, it doesn't totally overwhelm them.

I thought the FLu v coronavirus debate was pretty much done. I don't know what more evidence people need tbh.

 

[tom73]

FFS people are dying and all some what to do is “oh do pass me a sandwich“

Police break up a house party complete with buffet.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-engla...ws/england&link_location=live-reporting-story

 

[RecordAceFromNew]

It's a great relief that yesterday's record not surpassed. Am I right in thinking Sunday figures have generally been lower throughout, or did I imagine that?

I am afraid the daily variation means very little - there is no way the exponential growth is going to stop any time soon, for the simple reason that people who died yesterday would have been infected two or three weeks ago on average, well before the change of isolation policy by the government, not to mention the current policy is far from strict:

What will further fuel the death rate is when we run out of spare ventilators, or staff who are adequately trained to sedate, inturbate and monitor them 24/7. Initial figures currently show of those who are put on ventilation roughly half make it, and half don't. If and when there is a shortage (probably over the next week), those who need one but can't have one will have little chance.

 

[dutchguylivingintheuk]

Everyone in employment has, or should have, an National Insurance number which could be used to identify workers who have had CV19 and okay to return to work.

Or they even sure that having had corona also means imminutiy ? I have read much about it but also that they weren't sure if that would be the case with experiences in China of poeple getting infected again, but on the other hand information from China is just as good as no information considering their track record.

I thought the FLu v coronavirus debate was pretty much done. I don't know what more evidence people need tbh.

I think it is an silly debate Coronavirus is an Novel virus in other terms not seen before yet, as the flu is pretty known by now. So there not comparable by definition.

 

[Pale Rider]

Unimpressive performance by the Channel 4 News hack who couldn't get Dr Jenny Harries' name correct when he asked a question in the live press conference just now.

 

[oldfatfool]

I know it's the wail but interesting non the less.PETER HITCHENS: This Great Panic is foolish, yet our freedom is broken https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...ippled.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead

 

[Rocky]

I know it's the wail but interesting non the less.PETER HITCHENS: This Great Panic is foolish, yet our freedom is broken https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...ippled.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead

Peter Hitchens or Professor Chris Whitty. It’s a difficult choice when it comes to whose advice to believe on Covid.