roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
And when we have 100% vaccinated, then, given that no vaccine is perfect, 100% of the (very few) cases will be vaccinated.
We crossed!
And when we have 100% vaccinated, then, given that no vaccine is perfect, 100% of the (very few) cases will be vaccinated.
It's a lot more complex that that.
Depending on which Vaccine you have had, and when you had it, your likely immunity will vary. For example, your first dose gives you a likely 76% efficacy rising to 82% after the second dose and time for that to take effect. This means that you are a lot less likely to get Covid than if you had not been vaccinated, but you can still get it.
If you have been immunised and you *do* get Covid, then you have another bonus which is that your body is already primed for it, so in most cases you will get a much milder infection than had you not been immunised.
But, the majority of people who have had serious hospitalisation have had co-morbidities. In other words, they were already ill with something else. This can alter how they are able to respond to infection. Some people were just unlucky and there is something in their genetic makeup which means that they have proved much more susceptible than others. We do know that obesity and breathing related illnesses (e.g. asthma) increase risk with Covid.
It may be that many people admitted to hospital with Covid, would have been admitted for something else anyway - due to age, comorbidities etc.
Then we have another factor which is that Covid mutates. The immunisations were based on the first variants isolated. As Covid changes, it may be that newer strains such as the Delta or Lambda are not as well protected against. It could also be that they cause less or more likely damage.
A simpler way to put it is this:-
You can reduce your chances of becoming seriously ill with Covid by getting immunised and by taking reasonable safety measures such as wearing a mask when in an area with poor ventilation and many people - e.g. shops. Good air flow can really help, but you want to avoid inhaling other people's breath.
There is no 100% protection other than staying in your home, not having any visitors and creating an airlock and quarantine process for delivered goods.
At the moment the UK Government (unlike some other countries) is not trying to eradicate Covid, just to mitigate the effect and reduce the risk of death and serious illness. No-one knows whether this is the right approach. It is however a bit of an outlier compared to many other countries.
A nice graphical illustration of why 40% vaccinated in hospital is, entirely counterintuitively, a good thing.
I doubt even that is 100% from what I've read. "Five nines" 99.999% maybe.There is no 100% protection other than staying in your home, not having any visitors and creating an airlock and quarantine process for delivered goods.
I think that's far too kind. It seems like the policy is merely to keep serious illness below hospital capacity and deaths below politically toxic levels, motivated by some misconception that businesses prefer the uncertainty of high case numbers, consequent isolations and looming lockdown and rule change possibilities to the certainty of regulations and circuit breakers.At the moment the UK Government (unlike some other countries) is not trying to eradicate Covid, just to mitigate the effect and reduce the risk of death and serious illness. No-one knows whether this is the right approach. It is however a bit of an outlier compared to many other countries.
But, the majority of people who have had serious hospitalisation have had co-morbidities. .
Bearing in mind, of course, that "40% vaccinated in hospital" means
40% of those in hospital with Covid have been vaccinated
and not
40% of those who have been vaccinated are in hospital
Some seem to be conflating the two scenarios.
I doubt even that is 100% from what I've read. "Five nines" 99.999% maybe.
I think that's far too kind. It seems like the policy is merely to keep serious illness below hospital capacity and deaths below politically toxic levels, motivated by some misconception that businesses prefer the uncertainty of high case numbers, consequent isolations and looming lockdown and rule change possibilities to the certainty of regulations and circuit breakers.
I've avoided this as a discussion point for some time but...
Friends who are Senior Medics, in various hospital disciplines, tell me that:
- By far the majority of COVID ICU patients they have had have been obese to seriously obese. Not all, but most.
- In March 2020, an ICU consultant at one of the big London hospitals looked around at the patients in his unit and put himself on a diet, and lost 3 stones in short order.
Friend, who is a just-about-to-qualify medical student, is volunteering as part of her course at a multi-disciplinary Long Covid clinic. A very significant proportion, not all, of the patients presenting, have a very high BMI.
Now clearly, there are many who have been badly affected by COVID to whom the above does not apply - but I have been startled by the frankness of their advice on this issue.
I've avoided this as a discussion point for some time but...
Friends who are Senior Medics, in various hospital disciplines, tell me that:
- By far the majority of COVID ICU patients they have had have been obese to seriously obese. Not all, but most.
- In March 2020, an ICU consultant at one of the big London hospitals looked around at the patients in his unit and put himself on a diet, and lost 3 stones in short order.
Friend, who is a just-about-to-qualify medical student, is volunteering as part of her course at a multi-disciplinary Long Covid clinic. A very significant proportion, not all, of the patients presenting, have a very high BMI.
Now clearly, there are many who have been badly affected by COVID to whom the above does not apply - but I have been startled by the frankness of their advice on this issue.
I doubt even that is 100% from what I've read. "Five nines" 99.999% maybe.
I think that's far too kind. It seems like the policy is merely to keep serious illness below hospital capacity and deaths below politically toxic levels, motivated by some misconception that businesses prefer the uncertainty of high case numbers, consequent isolations and looming lockdown and rule change possibilities to the certainty of regulations and circuit breakers.
Just from a quick google, no idea how authoritative, but point estimates for the obese of
49% more likely to be hospitalised
82% more likely to die
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-021-00771-z
No, it is lifting nothing. Once again, it introduces my opinion and nothing further is supported by it."seems" doing heavy lifting again, it seems!
See, it is a useful shorthand!
France requiring a "health passport" for access to cultural venues containing 50+ people. From 1 August, it will also be needed to access cafes, bars and restaurants, even on terraces, planes, trains, hotels and shared facilities on campsites. The state train operator was surprised by the presidential announcement. (source: tv news this lunchtime)
I've avoided this as a discussion point for some time but...
Friends who are Senior Medics, in various hospital disciplines, tell me that:
- By far the majority of COVID ICU patients they have had have been obese to seriously obese. Not all, but most.
- In March 2020, an ICU consultant at one of the big London hospitals looked around at the patients in his unit and put himself on a diet, and lost 3 stones in short order.
Friend, who is a just-about-to-qualify medical student, is volunteering as part of her course at a multi-disciplinary Long Covid clinic. A very significant proportion, not all, of the patients presenting, have a very high BMI.
Now clearly, there are many who have been badly affected by COVID to whom the above does not apply - but I have been startled by the frankness of their advice on this issue.