DCLane
Found in the Yorkshire hills ...
- Location
- Dewsbury, West Yorkshire
@kingrollo - SWMBO, who's a Registered Dietitan and Registered Nutritionist, uses both BMI and skin-fold thickness which gives a better body fat percentage.
The only 2 people I’ve known personally to have Covid bad are very over weight & one was in his 20’s.Interesting. Maybe as aside but hasn't bmi been discredited as a health indicator ? - from memory it wasn't a good measure for people who had bulked up in the gym , they have a low fat % - but still score poor on BMI.
Theres also the deadly 'skinny fat' who are slightly built and sail though any BMI stats\measurements - but because of thin bones actually have a lot of fat !
The only two people I know from my family who have died from Covid were thin, caught it in hospital while they were having an operation for something unrelated…..and sadly never came out. Yes, obesity is a risk factor (because of breathing problems) but thin people have died.The only 2 people I’ve known personally to have Covid bad are very over weight & one was in his 20’s.
To catch it mild you’re unlucky & to have a bad case you’re very unlucky & to die you’re super unlucky. Not even the top scientists can predict how things will be at Christmas time. It’s just the new normal so we must get on with life & stop virtue signalling on social media.
Body builders don't make up the majority (or bulk) of those classified as obeseInteresting. Maybe as aside but hasn't bmi been discredited as a health indicator ? - from memory it wasn't a good measure for people who had bulked up in the gym , they have a low fat % - but still score poor on BMI.
Of course not. They are just one group where BMI would give a misleading reading. Skinny but flabby being another.Body builders don't make up the majority (or bulk) of those classified as obese
Whichever, the relationship between high BMI and severity of illness seems to show that BMI is a useful rough and ready guide, even with the outlying groups included.Of course not. They are just one group where BMI would give a misleading reading. Skinny but flabby being another.
The point of what I was saying is that these groups would poor BMI stats but be in good shape health-wise and vice versa for skinny fat.
When I finally realised I needed to shed some weight, my BMI which was then about 82 kilos was a wake up call that much more had to go than the four or five I had envisaged! That would have left me significantly overweight despite fit through cycling.BMI is a useful rough and ready guide
Interesting. Maybe as aside but hasn't bmi been discredited as a health indicator ? - from memory it wasn't a good measure for people who had bulked up in the gym , they have a low fat % - but still score poor on BMI.
Theres also the deadly 'skinny fat' who are slightly built and sail though any BMI stats\measurements - but because of thin bones actually have a lot of fat !
Why is she having to isolate?
Wasn’t she wearing PPE? She didn’t have the NHS App switched on did she?
(sorry for the questions but she shouldn’t be having to isolate if IPC rules followed)
I can't believe you indulge in this sort of misinformation. You posts normally have validity.I can't be sure - but I thought I read a stat today that 40% of admissions are vaccinated people.???
If true the whole effectiveness of the vaccine must be in doubt.
I seem to be hearing everyday that double jabbed people are going down with covid. Weren't we told it's effectiveness was around 90%.????
Rumours. Bound to be some planning going on, for worst case scenarios. Look at the SPI-M modelling and look at the bounds of uncertainty (I shared one of these up thread).The hospital where I work there are rumours of redeployment of non clinical staff on a scale that will dwarf that of the first 2 waves.
Absolutely - I assume that @kingrollo was trying to get someone to make this point.How many people with two jabs and the 2-3 weeks after the second (to build up further protection) actually end up on death's door in ICU? I don't have the numbers, but I do know that people drawing the conclusion that " jabs don't work" need to be quoted in the OED under "Stupidity".
A first dose of any vaccine will not give you 76% effectiveness against infection: more like 32%. But the second dose (14 days after) lifts that to 80+% right enough.For example, your first dose gives you a likely 76% efficacy rising to 82% after the second dose and time for that to take effect. This means that you are a lot less likely to get Covid than if you had not been vaccinated, but you can still get it.