classic33
Leg End Member
Is that the same "Area 51" where Tesla lorries are sent for repair?
Specially trained personal only, into the area.
Is that the same "Area 51" where Tesla lorries are sent for repair?
Unfortunately, Tesla's look pretty crap. I like the Honda e but it's range is rubbish, but then again it would be ideal for us, and keep an ICE for bike haulage and distance.
If you're going to 'keep an ICE for bike haulage and distance', with the associated depreciation, insurance, servicing, tax and other costs, are these more than offset by the cheaper running costs of the EV, also allowing for the (probably) higher purchase cost of the EV vs an equivalent ICE?
Unfortunately, Tesla's look pretty crap
I just just feel lucky to have experienced the heyday of ICE vehicles, we will have this again.
My current BMW 330d is now probably the last of the proper 6 cylinder BMW’s. although it has an infotainment screen, it still has analogue gauges and an old fashioned handbrake. Perhaps I’m just a bit of a dinosaur.
View attachment 700530
We can bore the grandchildren with stories of petrol and spark plugs and they won't have clue!!
Maybe they need to up their game? I like my VW ID4 but the software is shoddy and it lacks many of the bells and whistles a Tesla has at the same price. If I had a choice I would go for a Tesla 4 over the ID4 any day.VW are stopping production lines in China, Germany and Brasil. There are drone videos of literally tens of thousands of cars stockpiled. How long can a company keep making cars, no one is buying?
Wow what a shock.
The range estimate on my thermal car is also poor. Below 80 miles, it changes to a refuel now message.My Renault Grand Scenic used to have a thing that estimated how many miles you could travel with the diesel left in the tank. It was also hopeless.
And aero / speed. The aero and speed make a big difference.EVs should be able to estimate range better because many of the efficiency -changing variables ( gearing, revs, stop/starts) don't apply to them as much so it seems it should be a simpler Watts remaining divided by Watts needed per mile calculation. Outdoor temperature seems like the biggest new influence.