vickster
Legendary Member
£15K for a Skoda CITIGOe iV or £16K for a Seat e-Mii Electric. Both being 4 door models.
Bargain! Not showing on autotrader at those prices at least not in numbers or in the SE
£15K for a Skoda CITIGOe iV or £16K for a Seat e-Mii Electric. Both being 4 door models.
Bargain! Not showing on autotrader at those prices at least not in numbers or in the SE
Nope.
I took that from here https://www.moneyexpert.com/car-insurance/cheapest-electric-cars/
Didn't think to check that data.
You are right they are not that low, and they aren't even available new any more, even though that article was only from November.
People moaning about paying 15k for electric car, but happy to pay 3, 4, 5k for a bicycle………and some even more than that.
People moaning about paying 15k for electric car, but happy to pay 3, 4, 5k for a bicycle………and some even more than that.
I suspect most of those complaining about £15K for a car are not the ones who will be paying £5K for a bike.
Some people are willing to pay £5K+ for a bike. Some are willing to pay £30K+ for a car. Those are more likely to be the same people.
Who said it came from central government????
I’m not really sure why the (council) taxpayer should be paying to facilitate the charging of privately owned vehicles myself
Why should I fund your electric vehicle usage?Let me try again. £££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
They get a cut of the profit from charging for the electricity.
So the Taxpayer should be paying to facilitate the charging of privately owned vehicles as it will generate more revenue that can be used to fund services that the Taxpayer may use.
If you had reached the end of the sentence, I answered the question.Why should I fund your electric vehicle usage?
I had reached the end of your unedited post. The council provide the lampposts for the charging points, and the supply to the lamp posts comes via council spending. A private company then comes along, charges the council for using what the council installed. And the council is liable for the maintanence of the lamp posts.If you had reached the end of the sentence, I answered the question.
However - the detailed version is that it is the same reason that you invest in any company. You expect a good financial return.
For example the revenue earned from the lamp post chargers could be used to fund solar projects within the area. These in turn generate revenue by supplying energy to National Grid and reducing the cost of electricity, thus reducing the need for Government subsidy, thus freeing up more money to pay Nurses or Firefighters or fix pot holes or build new cycle infrastructure.
This is the skinny for Brighton from 2019:-The return can't be that great. The last six on council owned property were closed off last year. At 79p per kWh* they should have been raking it in. Now behind a fence to a building site, where work was halted six months ago.
The project is being funded with £300,000 from the Office of Low Emissions (OLEV), and £100,000 from Electric Blue.
Electric Blue will also be also providing four rapid taxi charger hubs, after the council successfully bid for £468,000 of OLEV funding (75% for the total cost). The remaining 25% (£117,000) will be covered by Electric Blue.
Charging costs 26p per kw/h for lamppost chargers, 27p per kw/h for fast and rapid chargers and are fuelled by 100% renewable energy. The council will receive 1p per kwh in year one increasing to 4p per kwh in year 4, which can be reinvested in more charge points.
So it seems that if a lamp post is in use 50% of the time and delivering 6kwh of electricity that's 72p per day or £262.80 for the year per lamp post so 52k per year revenue. In year 4 that becomes £208,000 per year. They are likely to get more money from the rapid taxi charging hubs.The council has also been awarded £86,265 research funding from Innovate UK for a trial of smart network extenders, which increase the number of vehicles which can be charged at each point.