Yeah they tweaked a few things behind the scenes since launch, but main thing they changed from our side is that your ZRS can now go 15% below your floor (which a lot of people say is too much).
It works quite well for flat races, but it needs modifiers for different courses. Or we just have to accept that sprinters won't win climby races, which is as it SHOULD be really
Cav struggles to make the time cut on the mountain stages. So if my strength is 30s-2m power I shouldn't be winning mountain races unless I'm racing people rated quite a bit lower than me. The thing I LIKE about ZRS is that it's putting people I'd never normally race against (e.g. A and A+ guys from week 1) in a pen with me and I'm not always losing. They are rated similar because although they have great aerobic ability, they have poor sprints. And if I beat them on a flat race, you can't say they shouldn't have been there.
The problem with being anaerobically biased is that eventually that sustained aerobic effort will be decisive. Yesterday the pace on the flats in France was too high for me to get enough recovery to finish well on the final climb. One guy attacked three times (12, 16 and 20km) on the flat and only one person got shaken out the back. But it was plenty enough to hurt my finish.
View attachment 745997