I would like to say that my comment earlier was probably missed as sarcastic by a few
I was responding to what Carl said the only way I could . I couldn’t believe the difference in our opinions and maybe he was being sarcastic too
To say I’m only going to enter races where you can surf at the back and go for glory off others efforts but not bother trying in other races that involve a full workout because they are boring amused me to the point where I broke my rule of not replying
To me that seems cherry picking and goes against a series of races
I can’t be the only one who thinks this , it just doesn’t seem sporting
This isn’t a dig at anyone , it’s my opinion , feel free to disagree as I have
All good Lee, I took what you said as a joke/sarcastic and took no offence
All I was suggesting, and what most seemed to be suggesting in the earlier parts of the chat, was a series of races that are more inclusive rather than races where the winner is known before the off and they end up becoming iTTs
Races that include 2-5 min punchy climbs will be good as it lets others apart from pure climbers the chance to fight to stay in touch. And so would be an excellent workout for all - you'd be trying to drop the sprinters, the sprinters would be totally in the red hoping to stay in touch.
I also a agree that a totally flat race wouldn't be as inclusive as it lets us sprinters sit in and unleash our 30 second power. Rolling courses much better, but I still think that a 'Tiny' series would be brilliant ... but then I love the Tiny race format so I'm biased.