Zwift Chat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

JuhaL

Guru
I'd be mega happy with just 1 mins slower on this stage compared to stage 1 ... well done :okay:
Thanks. I just compared my stage2 data to stage1 data and i noticed that my avg hr was same 144 but avg power was now better. Stage1 it was 173 and now 188. So this stage went exactly as i planed.
 

<Tommy>

Illegitimi non carborundum
Location
Camden, London
You're right - on tests up Alpe Du Zwift, a 75kg doing 300 watts would get to the top over 5 minutes quicker than an 82kg rider doing the same watts. On the way back down, the heavier rider will only be 7 seconds quicker :huh:

That’s crazy. On the course last night there’s a bit that goes up with a sudden descent afterwards. I was gapping lee quite quickly on the way down. But maybe that’s also because I was putting in more power than him to get over the top at the same time as him, and that acceleration carries through to the beginning of the descent.

That Kom climb on watopia is another one that is quite technical. I find there’s certain places on the climb that if you’re not on the ball you can really lose a chunk of time.
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
That’s crazy. On the course last night there’s a bit that goes up with a sudden descent afterwards. I was gapping lee quite quickly on the way down. But maybe that’s also because I was putting in more power than him to get over the top at the same time as him, and that acceleration carries through to the beginning of the descent.

That Kom climb on watopia is another one that is quite technical. I find there’s certain places on the climb that if you’re not on the ball you can really lose a chunk of time.
Yeah you were almost certainly doing far higher watts than Lee when you crested the climb (you would have had to to be doing similar w/kg or to stay with him) so this would be why you pulled away when the road went back down - the tests were done with two riders doing the same watts, not the same w/kg remember.

To be fair to Lee and other lighter riders, they would have had to work harder on the long flat sections, relative to a heavier rider able to generate higher watts
 
OP
OP
C

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
That’s crazy. On the course last night there’s a bit that goes up with a sudden descent afterwards. I was gapping lee quite quickly on the way down. But maybe that’s also because I was putting in more power than him to get over the top at the same time as him, and that acceleration carries through to the beginning of the descent.

That Kom climb on watopia is another one that is quite technical. I find there’s certain places on the climb that if you’re not on the ball you can really lose a chunk of time.

Now think about us mid 90s Kg riders:cry:
 

bobinski

Legendary Member
Location
Tulse Hill
Yeah you were almost certainly doing far higher watts than Lee when you crested the climb (you would have had to to be doing similar w/kg or to stay with him) so this would be why you pulled away when the road went back down - the tests were done with two riders doing the same watts, not the same w/kg remember.

To be fair to Lee and other lighter riders, they would have had to work harder on the long flat sections, relative to a heavier rider able to generate higher watts

Or lighter riders tuck in and draft.

In our group we were largely led by a guy pulling a consistent 5.2w/k on the flats. I thanked him whilst doing just enough to stay in behind him.
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Or lighter riders tuck in and draft.

In our group we were largely led by a guy pulling a consistent 5.2w/k on the flats. I thanked him whilst doing just enough to stay in behind him.
Yeah but if the light rider and heavier rider both stayed in the draft, the lighter rider would have to be working harder
 

berty bassett

Legendary Member
Location
I'boro
Yeah but if the light rider and heavier rider both stayed in the draft, the lighter rider would have to be working harder
Yeh - right on !!
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it tommy - I was shigged last night cos I worked harder 😁
 

<Tommy>

Illegitimi non carborundum
Location
Camden, London
Now think about us mid 90s Kg riders:cry:
Ah but unless you're about 7 foot tall, being 95kg is a lifestyle choice :popcorn: :cheers: ;)

(As is my own weight I hasten to add!)

I used to think about 95kg all the time. Then I dropped 20kg and I don’t think about it so much anymore 😁

Bloody miss the cake though. And I can’t look at a pack of cookies without drooling 🤪
 
Last edited:

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Actually it's quite complicated when you drill down into it!

Lighter riders have less drag in Zwift so will go faster for the same watts as a heavier rider even on the flat (short, lightweight riders have even less drag). Obviously doing the same watts would be a higher w/kg for the lighter rider though, so probably relatively harder work.

So, because lighter riders would be faster for the same watts they can afford to do fewer watts - i.e closer to the same w/kg as the heavier rider - to maintain the same speed.

So exactly who has to do relatively more work on the flat will depend on the weight/height differences.

Sorry Lee, you may have to accept its all easier for you and you really should be winning every race by a country mile or you're not really trying after all ^_^
 
Top Bottom