I am nice and the world is a slightly happier place for it.
Congratulations! That must be, er... nice for you...
I am nice and the world is a slightly happier place for it.
Sorry, you could have fooled me, bearing in mind what you said in your OP:A few people are misunderstanding me, Ben included (surprise surprise). I am not advocatiing being rude or angry, or deliberately obstructing people when it is perfectly safe for them to pass.
...so we will have to teach them, and if it means being a little bloody-minded, then so be it. Like many people, I often move over unnecessarily when cars want to pass while riding two abreast, just because it seems nicer, and drivers like it. Bollocks to it - I am now going to do the opposite, and ride two abreast at every opportunity (except when genuinely delaying an otherwise considerate driver) until the idiots learn. We need to stop moving over, or things will not get better.
It certainly is! I did a sort of the entire Commuting forum by Thread Starter (having figured out how to do that), and your name only comes up once. So would you agree, your first thread in a forum you appear not to frequent, is a wee bit confrontational, eh?Is it really my first? How exciting!
!
http://www.nationala...mpage_pedal.htm - you'll love the 'take a brush to your bike' bit seeing as yours hasn't got any paint.
A few people are misunderstanding me, Ben included (surprise surprise). I am not advocatiing being rude or angry, or deliberately obstructing people when it is perfectly safe for them to pass. I am merely suggesting that we cease the practice of unnecessarily falling into single file just to please motorists - almost everyone I know does this, and I think it is sending the wrong message. The obvious example is when the car would have to wait exactly the same amount of time to pass safely if you were alone and in secondary position. If there is someone behind me and my pulling over for a moment genuinely facilitates their considerate passing, without causing me delay or incovenience, then I am quite happy to do so.
Sorry, you could have fooled me, bearing in mind what you said in your OP:
It certainly is! I did a sort of the entire Commuting forum by Thread Starter (having figured out how to do that), and your name only comes up once. So would you agree, your first thread in a forum you appear not to frequent, is a wee bit confrontational, eh?
That's delicious irony!I usually swim in the calmer waters of P&L
I think I get your point. It's actually something I have discussed with others before. Riding two abreast, sometimes doesn't take up any more road than riding on your own. For example, on a road where the cyclist would be best in the primary position (1 cyclist), then it is perfectly reasonable for two cyclists to ride side by side, one in the secondary, one in the primary, taking up the same space. So if the cyclists did decide to single file it, then if they were riding correctly they would both be taking up the primary position, (perhaps one could be slightly less assertive in road position) taking up more of the road, and thus being more difficult to overtake.
The problem is driver perception. It looks more accommodating if you single up.
PEACE!!
That's delicious irony!
[Fiona and Charles mode]Completely untrue! Utterly,utterly, pure fantasy! Total moonshine! And yet - somehow - a grain of truth!?
[/Fiona and Charles mode]
Seems to me P&L does have its 'slow' days as someone mentioned. And you're right in that Commuting can get incendiary at times. Don't I know it. Ho hum. That's Cyclechat...
Must be a slow day in P&L.
As long as you can be seen by motorists it shouln't be too much of a problem ... get yourself seen!
http://www.nationala...mpage_pedal.htm - you'll love the 'take a brush to your bike' bit seeing as yours hasn't got any paint.
I'm entirely in earnest. This is far and away the touchiest bit of the forum. Only in Commuting will a suggestion to ride in a companionable fashion draw insinuations that you are something other than Nice.
I think I get your point. It's actually something I have discussed with others before. Riding two abreast, sometimes doesn't take up any more road than riding on your own. For example, on a road where the cyclist would be best in the primary position (1 cyclist), then it is perfectly reasonable for two cyclists to ride side by side, one in the secondary, one in the primary, taking up the same space. So if the cyclists did decide to single file it, then if they were riding correctly they would both be taking up the primary position, (perhaps one could be slightly less assertive in road position) taking up more of the road, and thus being more difficult to overtake.
The problem is driver perception. It looks more accommodating if you single up.
Just for info I reproduce rule 66 belowRide in single file on narrow or busy roads, I know these are suggestions, and in this case who defines busy or narrow, but as you say you were abused by 8 motorists in 1/2 mile I would say that was busy road.
- never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends
Good Luck