Profpointy
Legendary Member
Why would I need case law? Is the term "Tourism" enshrined in law?
I'd rather just go to the dictionary. Here are the first definitions that Google threw up for me:
the commercial organization and operation of holidays and visits to places of interest:
the business of providing services such as transport, places to stay, or entertainment for people who are on holiday
travel for pleasure or business, and the commercial activity of providing and supporting such travel.
So whether it's a package holiday to Torremolinos, a guided art tour of Florence, a guided walk up Snowdon, a guided trip to Svalbard, a trip to Everest base camp, a guided ascent of Everest or a guided visit to the Titanic it's all tourism. They all have risks and dangers.
So you don't believe the "violenti fit injuria" thing applies in this case?