I recall reading, perhaps in Tylers's book, that the year after Festina was clean, due to them all running scared, but USP upped the ante and the others followed suit so Ullrich and Pevenage may be telling the truth, but the bit about having no choice but to join the arms race is a bit dificult to swallow!
Unless you take the position that some drugs were better than none, and then the whole thing becomes much more complicated.
Like a lot on this thread I'm reading more than I'm commentating since the USADA report, and whilst I don't believe the 'level playing field' is a proper argument for the justification of cheating, is it perhaps naive to think that any help from the use of drugs would not be beneficial to those involved in a rivalry with a team that blatantly did have the best 'recipe'?
One of the most disturbing things to have come out of the USADA statement was the evidence to the fact that domestiques were also bullied into doping, EPO etc Now, when you consider that this obviously 'worked', what were rival teams to do to compete other than to implement some systematic, team -wide practice themselves?
History itself, as well as the hugely differential sums of money paid to corrupt doctors, says that there was no level playing field and that the best
drugs (and monitoring by doctors) won, not the best man/men. But, I believe there would have been those, like Ullrich et al, who would have tried to have gained what they considered that 'level playing field' through the use of PE drugs however off the mark they may have been in regard to the US Postal 'recipe.'
On a more general note, I expect a purge of the UCI. I can't see many more riders being implicated but the credibility of this organisation now must surely be the focal point given that other notable national anti-doping agencies are coming forward with evidence of their own past concerns.