I have now read the whole 202 pages of the USADA's reasoned decision and all of the English language avadavits in the appendix.
Some of the things that struck me which have not been commented on (or at least I haven't seen any comment on)...
-USADA got no evidence from FBI investigation, despite requesting it. That's odd no? Political pressure being applied?
-Kevin Livingston refused to testify. Why would that be? Let's see who his current employer is....
-Chris Carmichael seems to get off pretty much scot-free.
-The long held suspicion that Lance asked Trek to sever their ties with Greg Lemond looks to be confirmed.
-Axel Merckx was said to be working with Ferrari by Frankie Andreu. I thought Eddy had been a bit reticent with his ridiculous Lance defence.
On a couple of those points, as far as I understand it - since the FBI evidence was gathered in the context of a criminal trial, it couldn't be shared. i.e. it was gathered under sub poena, but for the USADA purposes they wouldn't have had the same ability to sub poena witnesses. There may be other reasons but I believe that's part of it.
The Chris Carmichael vs Michele Ferrari role is commented on in Hamilton's book. Whilst Carmichael is good at his own PR in relation to his coaching of Armstrong, it appears that he was really a bit part player, and not involved on the PEDs side. Ferrari was in reality LA's coach (and doctor). It has never really seemed that Carmichael had any input on the PED side.