The Football.....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

rollinstok

Well-Known Member
Location
morecambe
City were by far the better team and deserve to go on and win the league
I dont think Utd are that good a team and would perhaps struggle to make the top 4 without the decisions that go for them, and against anyone who dares to get near them.
 

Archie_tect

De Skieven Architek... aka Penfold + Horace
Location
Northumberland
Utd still relying on Scholes and Giggs?
 

defy-one

Guest
City played better and deserved to win. As for United - well even they don't have the buying power that City now have and so the balance of power is changing.

"you finish where you deserve in the Premiership"

Some results/decisions go for you, some against you, and they all balance out over the season
 

MarkF

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
Some results/decisions go for you, some against you, and they all balance out over the season

That's true, in every division bar the PL and especially not true in Man Utd's case this season. They have benefited greatly from penalty decisions going for them in both boxes.
 

MarkF

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
But evidently not Scouse. His troubled stay at LFC was a big setback for him and it might be the only thing that people will remember about him when the pressure mounts (and it will...).

His record at Liverpool was decent, a win ratio of 42%. Mr Dalglish and £105 million quid later............ they don't look much better.
 

swee'pea99

Legendary Member
Some results/decisions go for you, some against you, and they all balance out over the season
At the risk of sounding like a whiney big girl's blouse, I have to say that if and when QPR do take the drop, a fair string of abysmal recent refereeing decisions will be at least partly to blame (albeit the team can certainly take the lion's share of the credit, for playing like a bunch of can't-be-bothered second-rate part-timers far too often).
 

Inertia

I feel like I could... TAKE ON THE WORLD!!
I thought Scholes was outstanding, but doesn't really have the legs for a high tempo match any more.

Whilst I think City are a better team than Utd, I can't get excited about them buying winning the league - to me they're Chelsea mk2.
They are, though I'm quite pleased for the fans who have lived in Utds shadow for a long time. In my opinion buying the league didn't start with Chelsea though.
 
They are, though I'm quite pleased for the fans who have lived in Utds shadow for a long time. In my opinion buying the league didn't start with Chelsea though.
good grief no - Sunderland were known as the Bank of England club when they won the league in 1950 after breaking the transfer record fee twice in quick succession - then got relegated after being caught paying over the wage limits.
 

on the road

Über Member
His record at Liverpool was decent, a win ratio of 42%. Mr Dalglish and £105 million quid later............ they don't look much better.
The difference is that Liverpool have won the League Cup and are in the FA Cup Final, with Hodgson they went out in the early rounds, so they are better with Dalglish.
 

soulful dog

Veteran
Location
Glasgow
They are, though I'm quite pleased for the fans who have lived in Utds shadow for a long time. In my opinion buying the league didn't start with Chelsea though.
Blackburn are the team everyone looks at in the Premiership era, people don't seem to look down on Chelsea in quite the same way, nor will they at Man City either, I suppose because the at least have the level of support and general size of club to be up in the top half of the table anyway (though I guess it'll depend on how much money the owners continue to pump into the club, with the fair play rules coming in they shouldn't be able to make it quite so lop-sided in City's favour).

As much as they might have bought their way to the title, you can't help but feel a wee bit pleased for their fans for exactly that reason you've stated. They deserve a wee bit of happiness like you say..... a pity some of their fans already seem so arrogant about it already! Such is life I suppose.
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
They have no structure or dynamics in the team. They can't play in a team neither. Rooney and Hart might as well play 'Goal to Goal'
Ok. I know this is hopelessly optimistic, but, hey, what's the alternative? It might be that Hodgson can use his usual 'do it this way' method to good effect. We don't have the luxury of picking a side dominated by one or two teams (Spain) or by players that have grown up together (Germany) so there's no chance of that innate understanding that livened up the 2010 World Cup. And, yes, the semis are probably going to be about it. But, given time, and a free rein with selection, I do think that Hodgson's meticulous control can get the best out of so-so players - see Fulham, Internazionale and West Brom.

I'm bound to agree about Rooney, though. For all his extraordinary talent, if he loses it, he really loses it.....
 

green1

Über Member
His record at Liverpool was decent, a win ratio of 42%. Mr Dalglish and £105 million quid later............ they don't look much better.
His career win ratio is 42%, is that good enough for the England Manager? At least the football plated under KD is better to watch although not there yet.

At least the England players can now book their summer holidays for the 20th of June.
 
His career win ratio is 42%, is that good enough for the England Manager? At least the football plated under KD is better to watch although not there yet.

At least the England players can now book their summer holidays for the 20th of June.
Terry Vernables' was 44 odd (47 with England) and he was more than good enough... Good football to watch too. He won a Liga and a Cup final as opposed to Uncle Woy's couple of Swedish Championships...
 
Top Bottom