The CycleChat Large SUV Owners Club thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
Drago

Drago

Legendary Member
The article is crap. If its made in 1985 it isn't a Defender at all. It's merely a 'Ninety'.
 
OP
OP
Drago

Drago

Legendary Member
It's like when the original Defender was killed off the media prattle on about it being in production for 70 years, which is arrant nonsense. When the general architecture was broadly similar the Defender is a very different vehicle to the series models.
 

Jameshow

Veteran
It's like when the original Defender was killed off the media prattle on about it being in production for 70 years, which is arrant nonsense. When the general architecture was broadly similar the Defender is a very different vehicle to the series models.

But that's the evolution of a brand, they are still the same basic vehicle? Like saying a split screen moggie and a 1972 moggie aren't the same. They are but the design was much improved over 50yrs.
 

Gunk

Guru
Location
Oxford
It's like when the original Defender was killed off the media prattle on about it being in production for 70 years, which is arrant nonsense. When the general architecture was broadly similar the Defender is a very different vehicle to the series models.

But most non car nerds just know it as a Defender
 
But most non car nerds just know it as a Defender
Or is it just the general public who do that?
Surely the earlier vehicles are known as the 'Series' models??
Although, I'll 'hold my hand up here', when mentioning Range Rovers to people (or on social media), I'll refer to them as (as I'll call them) 'Series ...' (barring the original 70-95 shape, to me that's 'the real Range Rover')
 
Top Bottom