Really? Do we really need irrelevant pictures of animals with or without hats?Really? Can't this just die now?
If I thought for one minute that there was any advantage to be had by wearing a helmet, then I might be tempted to carry a cleaning kit with me (or spare pads) so that I could freshen things up after a stop; however..............Oh you are both a wheeze worrying about a bit of sweat, I think you're participating in the wrong activity if you're worried about a little bit of sweat!!
Most pads are removable and able to be cleaned you know.
Little bit of OCD perhaps?If I thought for one minute that there was any advantage to be had by wearing a helmet, then I might be tempted to carry a cleaning kit with me (or spare pads) so that I could freshen things up after a stop; however..............
Little bit of OCD perhaps?
Most pads are removable and able to be cleaned you know.
Having a problem with sweat means that you are sweating faster than it is evaporating. So the factors include how hot it is, how humid it is, how hard you are working, how fit you are are, what you are wearing, how long your hair is, your physiology (some people just sweat more than others) etc etc. So not sweating isn't a problem, it's a gift. Someone who does sweat a lot might be able to use it as a measure of how hard he is working, but you can't compare two different people's level of sweat to the amount of work they are doing.Don't seem to have a problem with sweat whilst cycling... maybe I should try pedalling a bit quicker?
Going back to this Smith v Finch case:Well no.
"The Defendant has not discharged the burden of proving contributory negligence on the part of the Claimant for another, more fundamental reason – the Defendant has failed to persuade me that an approved helmet would have prevented or made less severe the head injuries sustained by the Claimant"
Essentially the judge says that he thinks it's sensible to wear a bike helmet, but that in the case (which, remember, is very similar to most cases where "a helmet saved my life") the lack of a helmet didn't do anything.
There's a case review at http://www.cyclistsdefencefund.org....ing-cycle-helmets-and-contributory-negligence which makes it clear that the opinion of their lawyer is that the case doesn't set legal precedent.
Having a problem with sweat means that you are sweating faster than it is evaporating. So the factors include how hot it is, how humid it is, how hard you are working, how fit you are are, what you are wearing, how long your hair is, your physiology (some people just sweat more than others) etc etc. So not sweating isn't a problem, it's a gift. Someone who does sweat a lot might be able to use it as a measure of how hard he is working, but you can't compare two different people's level of sweat to the amount of work they are doing.
I've got a friend who has sweaty hands. She has to keep a bit of paper under her hand when she is writing, or the paper gets damp. As far as I can tell, she is not giving her hand a big workout when she writes a shopping list.
(in all but the very hottest conditions, I don't drip with sweat, but under a helmet my hair gets distinctly wet even in UK summer)
Is this a serious suggestion? I think it would be overkill in the UK (carrying a cool bag containing a single buff?) and useless in Australia (heat stroke moment was after 100km ride in the sun, everything would have melted hours ago and lugging a cool bag to Frankston and back would have measurably increased the work)Buff (or similar)
Soak in water, wring out
Place in plastic bag, then place bag in freezer
Carry in cool bag
When needed take out and wear
Wrap your head in the same material used for cavity wall insulation and see if you overheat more easily?Don't seem to have a problem with sweat whilst cycling... maybe I should try pedalling a bit quicker?