He's not going to like that. Simpson isn't listed.NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DID YOU READ THIS???????
http://www.dopeology.org/people/list/by:default|order:asc|batch:20|page:1/
He's not going to like that. Simpson isn't listed.NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DID YOU READ THIS???????
http://www.dopeology.org/people/list/by:default|order:asc|batch:20|page:1/
He's not going to like that. Simpson isn't listed.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DID YOU READ THIS???????
http://www.dopeology.org/people/list/by:default|order:asc|batch:20|page:1/
He's not going to like that. Simpson isn't listed.
...and he didn't fail a test!Could that be because it is limited from 1980 to the present?
It clearly states this at the title!
I realised that and saw that, how did you miss it?
I didn't miss it. You can figure the rest out.Could that be because it is limited from 1980 to the present?
It clearly states this at the title!
I realised that and saw that, how did you miss it?
I doubt he canI didn't miss it. You can figure the rest out.
Never failed a test - and post mortem's don't count!
The death of Danish cyclist Knud Enemark Jensen during competition at the Olympic Games in Rome 1960 (the autopsy revealed traces of amphetamine) increased the pressure for sports authorities to introduce drug testing.
I didn't miss it. You can figure the rest out.
...and he didn't fail a test!
BTW, did you read post #191????????
Was posting a list of riders from 1980 onwards and commenting that Simpson wasn't lists some kind of test?
Apparently it is some kind of test..... and according to RichP- you passed
there's quite a few on the list that never failed a doping test....
Tyler Hamilton, cyclist
Drug: Oxygen-rich blood transfusion
Explanation: When The the US Anti-Doping Agency detected someone else's red blood cells in Hamilton's blood, the road racer blood had an imaginative excuse. He claimed that the cells belonged to a "vanishing twin" who died in the womb – an explanation considered theoretically possible but unlikely by medical experts. Sporting authorities were sceptical; the transfusion of blood containing high levels of oxygen-carrying red cells is known to increase athletic performance.
Result: Despite the "blood doping" allegations Hamilton was allowed to keep his 2004 Olympic medal because his second sample was untestable after being damaged in the laboratory. But he was banned for two years in 2005 after a second positive test.
...and this one, which his still without a reply The Armstrong Lie
Are you trying to make a point or just have a squabble?
I really am at a loss as to what your point is, was or might be.
Again.. it is a simple reply to a post, addressing the question asked.