Team BKool CycleChat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

gbrown

Geoff on Bkool
Location
South Somerset
I look forward to seeing it, if I can figure out how to add your ghost I'll race you tomorrow.

Find my session and then challenge me using the button at the top right!

Nice route, thanks.
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
Bkool doesn't link to the Zwift software yet, even after the updates it just keeps searching....

Did you email zwift to see why?

Not just now, but I emailed them at work earlier today to change my profile to a BKool user as I originally registered as a power crank user. Maybe there is some BETA function they need to switch for me now to link to the BKool?
I'll keep you posted what they say.

The Bkool uses a closed ANT+ protocol, not the open protocol that the Wahoo Kickr, Cycleops Powerbeam etc use, as such is it NOT supported by Zwift. They state this explicitly in the support section of the website, which you will have access too if you are a beta user.

One accepted into the beta, it doesn't matter which kind of user you originally registered as (this appears to have only been of relevance in selecting who gets access to the beta and the order in which people get access, i.e. certain types of supported trainers, power meters etc), you can simply pair a different device, so long as it is supported. Since the Bkool is not supported you won't be able to use it.
 
Last edited:

Pedro2015

Active Member
Location
Liverpool
The Bkool uses a closed ANT+ protocol, not the open protocol that the Wahoo Kickr, Cyclops Powerbeam etc use, as such is it NOT supported by Zwift. They state this explicitly in the support section of the website, which you will have access too if you are a beta user.

One registered, it doesn't matter which kind of user you registered as, you can change the device. However you won't be able to use the Bkool.

Will it ever be supported by trainer road then? If the company was ever going bankrupt they would have to open it up or we would all be stuffed
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
Will it ever be supported by trainer road then? If the company was ever going bankrupt they would have to open it up or we would all be stuffed

It will only be supported when Bkool open up their ANT+ protocol, i.e. it is in their hands! Trainer road in the past have stated they have no intention of reverse engineering the protocol in order to support it whilst Bkool maintain a closed system. Zwift have stated they will support the Bkool, if Bkool open up the protocol.
 

Add

Guru
Location
Powys, Wales
Mmm, Geoff still no sign of my Ponferrada attempt!! Looks like I might have to do it again! Just another glitch in the BKool Matrix I assume?
 

gbrown

Geoff on Bkool
Location
South Somerset
It will only be supported when Bkool open up their ANT+ protocol, i.e. it is in their hands! Trainer road in the past have stated they have no intention of reverse engineering the protocol in order to support it whilst Bkool maintain a closed system. Zwift have stated they will support the Bkool, if Bkool open up the protocol.

I'm not sure why Bkool would open up the protocol on a trainer that costs half the price of it's competitors? I was thinking about this and they appear to primarily be a software company that probably outsourced the design and manufacture of a trainer which they can sell at little profit to support their software platform, so they make money from the subscriptions and build up the customer base and momentum they need. They would be mad to open it up so it can be used with other software, so they make little on the trainer and nothing on the software.

If they did open it up they would have to charge for it, or make a more expensive model that was open, and keep the current models proprietary.

I expect the hardware engineers talked about supporting the ANT+ trainer protocol, I expect the accountants and marketing people overruled them!

I hope to be surprised, but businesses rarely do something which would so clearly be damaging to their own business.

If people stop buying the trainers because they are closed, and buy open ones, then bkool will hope to gain some of those as customers for the software platform, and will probably not miss the small margin from the lost trainer sale. In fact, if their trainer sales fell substantially, they would probably keep them closed and reduce the price as far as they can, to keep acquiring customers for their software platform. That's what I would do ...
:evil:

Geoff
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
I was not debating the merits of opening up the software, merely answering the question posed.
 

Richylad

Active Member
Location
Staffordshire
You guys need to use Zwift before you get too excited about it, zwift maybe visually pleasing but it's a different animal to bkool. current bkool issues aside bkool has a lot more to offer currently.
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
You guys need to use Zwift before you get too excited about it, zwift maybe visually pleasing but it's a different animal to bkool. current bkool issues aside bkool has a lot more to offer currently.

Zwift is still in beta and the developers have purposefully limited what is available to the bare minimum therefore the comparison it rather futile.
 

kipster

Guru
Location
Hampshire
But you can only compare what you are presented with not what is promised. As I don't have zwift I can do no comparison so am grateful to those that can and do. From the reviews I have read they are different tools anyway so future comparison will enable me to compare what tool is right for the job I want it to do.
 
Top Bottom