Sorry to come to this so late, but I'm curious to hear, from people who've changed to using Di2 or Si2. Is the benefit of the electronic shift such a user-friendly improvement that you wouldn't go back to traditional gear changing again?
I consider myself to be a major Di2 fanboy, I have the diagnostic tools for all versions and a number of bikes with it, including a MTB... Its an outstanding system imho
Im more of a fan though of the early Dura-Ace Di2 as you could cut and splice it as you wished to introduce new features, the latest versions are more controlled and modular, they require diagnostics tools and new methods to tweak. The reality is that modifying them is not so easy.
When selecting a group set for my new road bike I selected SRAM Red 22,
when selecting a groupset for my new MTB I selected SRAM XX1
So although I am a massive fan of Di2, you have to be honest, it has some good points and some bad points as do all group sets.
The reality for me is that at this time SRAM simply offers more value for money, better performance and weight, not to mention its simply a more interesting groupset than Di2 at this time