The trouble is the CTC, (a wonderful organisation made up of what we might call 'classic cyclists' ie people who were bound together because of a love of cycling both touring and day to day stuff - all types of cycling actually - and it was essentialy pinched from its members by people who had a hidden and much different agenda. That meant classic cycling would have to share its place with people who saw it primarily as a means of driving social change. I have nothing against that. It may be very important. But I don't want it achieved at the expense of the first. Actually, I and many others I expect would say, we were hoodwinked into agreeing a new format that made fundamental changes to the CTC and its priorities, changes that were somewhat hidden from us when they were first being discussed. What the new people wanted was a huge membership list and a loose association with cycling and thousands of memebers to give it some cycling validity. The people like me ended up with an organisation that is very different and with much less of what we had before all of this happened.
Last edited: