Rebranding of Cycling Uk

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
PhilipBenstead007

PhilipBenstead007

Active Member
Amy Lamé,
Yeap definitely the case tbh..
But it happens to many organisations tbh YHA, CRT, NT, etc they forget the core members and try and widen the membership and it only leads to diluting the ethos usually due to commercial motives

The membership was often warned, including at the CTC AGM in Sheffield, but the members did not listen.
 

rogerzilla

Legendary Member
Amy Lamé,


The membership was often warned, including at the CTC AGM in Sheffield, but the members did not listen.
The members voted against conversion but the Chairman used all the proxy votes, which didn't express a preference, to override it. It was banana republic stuff.
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
I am only a member now for the insurance.

I think that is the case for a lot of people, me included.
 

Boopop

Guru
I see some people on here disagreed with the name change from CTC to CyclingUK. I don't.

These days Cycling UK spend a lot of their resources on campaigning to make cycling an easy first choice for running errands, like taking kids to school, going to the shops, work and so on.

I go on cycle tours/bike packing trips myself. Making cycling safer for utilitarian trips is far more important for social justice and the climate crisis than anything I could want as a holidaying cyclist. I'm so glad they've taken up the mantle of being the advocate for the every day cyclist, rather than what is, let's face it, the very niche pursuit of going on cycle touring holidays.

Anyone who's read their magazine knows they still talk a lot about cycling holidays, but I think "Cycling UK" as a name reflects their most important work better.
 

abcd efg

Über Member
But they should have started a new organisation to do that, not destroy an existing one. Actually, members like me are somewhat to blame as we weren't quick enough (or perhaps committed enough) to put a stop to the takeover. Certainly there certainly is a need for something like Cycling UK, but there are thousands like me who also need the CTC as it was.
 

Boopop

Guru
But they should have started a new organisation to do that, not destroy an existing one. Actually, members like me are somewhat to blame as we weren't quick enough (or perhaps committed enough) to put a stop to the takeover. Certainly there certainly is a need for something like Cycling UK, but there are thousands like me who also need the CTC as it was.

I think "need" is a bit strong of a word when we're comparing transport poverty to going for a nice cycle touring holiday.
 

abcd efg

Über Member
I guess you didn't read what I wrote. I agreed that something Cycling UK was necessary. What I also said that such an organisation should be established to do that, not take over an existing organisation with a different remit.
 

Boopop

Guru
I guess you didn't read what I wrote. I agreed that something Cycling UK was necessary. What I also said that such an organisation should be established to do that, not take over an existing organisation with a different remit.
I read the entirity of what you wrote, I just think when comparing transport poverty to cycling holidays, no-one "needs" CTC in its original format. I agree such an organisation campaigning for things that make cycling holidays is good and I'd like that too.

I admit it's a minor point!
 
Top Bottom