stevo
Active Member
- Location
- manchester
hi norm it was off road and it took me 60 minutes to do 10miles.Norm said:Time is more of a factor than distance, IMO. You don't say what sort of riding you were doing (on or off road) but, if you're on the road, you probably did around 45 minutes? That's a decent amount of time for any exercise / position if you aren't used to it.
If you did 10 miles without dying , you can still walk and sit, no significant muscle pains and you thought it was fun, then I don't think there's much reason to shorten your run.
As an aside, I'm 46 and around 19 stone - still, even after cycling for 8 months. I started off doing short-ish runs along the Thames, about 10 miles but it was taking me around 50-55 minutes as it was mostly off road. After a couple of months of doing that, 3 or 4 times a week, I did a 50 mile tow-path run to Kingston and back, and loved every second. So, a month later, I caught the train to the middle of Wiltshire and did a 60-odd mile run along the Kennet and Avon, again without a problem. A couple of weeks ago (before I lost my job ), I did my 40-odd mile commute on the bike, through the Chilterns, and loved it.
Don't punish yourself, keep it fun, keep it interesting (varied routes and rides) and enjoy it.
I also went from having zero working bikes in June to having 5 now. Beware the lure of N+1.
Addictive stuff, this cycling.
my legs did hurt like a burning feeling in them but only when i got in thick mud.
i am 13 stone and my bike has off road tyres on it.but i also have another bike which is an hard-tail with semi slick tyres on it. i found riding on the road with the off road tyres tiring.that's one reason i went off road.
bike one with off road tyres (is full suspension).
bike two with semi slick tyres(is only front suspension) .
which would you say is best for road use.just want get out there and enjoy it.
thanks Steve.