Team? Is there a proven link between Masi, RB & his actions?
To be fair it's Toto Wolff that started the trend for haranguing the race director over the radio live during the race and Ramilton himself to a lesser degree rrom the cockpit.
Charlie Whiting had the bandwidth to deal with it - he was a remarkably talented and capable individual - and it is perhaps unfair to Masi or indeed any individual to be able to drop straight in and perform at a level that took Whiting decades to achieve. Masi had enough to do without the teams trying to directly manipulate him.
At several times earlier in the '21 season it worked in MB's favour and the MB fans never batted an eyelid. It was all jolly japes when the game was being played in their favour. The MB fans actually loved it. When the cards fell their way it was fair and just.
I don't have a lot of time for Ramilton since he tried to blame racism for his ill fortune at Monaco in 2011, but I do have sympathy with him over Masi's decision. However, it's his team that started the "
hassle the race director" game over the radio and it only suddenly becomes unfair/cheating/a red bull conspiracy when suddenly they're losing at it.
Part of being a mature adult is understanding that your own actions can have unintended consequences, and learning to take it on the chin when that happens. Well, Wolff created a monster and when jt mattered most he lost control of it. The world is a much better place now the FIA have banned such contact during the actual race, and the directors duties are now split among several individuals.
In any case, Felipe Massa is right. Even if he were gifted the 8th championship he would still
morally only have 7 titles because he only won the first one because Flavio Briatore illegally attempted to manipulate the race by having Piquet Jr deliberately crash, and resulting safety car etc worked inadvertently in Ramilton's favour.
His fans can't have it both ways - if race results should be over ruled to suit them because of perceived error or cheating, then that should equally apply to his first title. You can't pick and choose. Whichever way you look at it, in absolute terms or moral terms, he has 7 titles because if you gift him the 8th then the same logic must also disregard the 1st.
Edit - here we go. Ramilton won the championship by a single point, so this race that was very deliberately manipulated was key in winning him the title. Its long been known that Briatore rigged this and he was expelled from the sport, but new information has come to light that Mosley and Ecclestone deliberately chose not to correct the race result for what they felt was the greater good of the sport, ie, viewing figures and thus Bernie's income.
So by all means give Lewis his 8th title, but by the same logic the 1st must surely now be taken from him and given to Massa in order to satisfy icowden's craving for fairness.
https://racingnews365.com/massa-assessing-legal-options-over-2008-title-loss-to-hamilton
So that's 7 titles, not 8, whichever way you choose to slice the cake. When it happens let's be sure to tell the fans that it is what icowden wanted. Who knows, if this goes all the way to law and Massa wins (unlikely in the extreme, but let's pretend) then poor old Lewis will have only 6 titles and icowden will probably spontaneously combust.