More fuel for the helmet debate

[Red Light]

There's no need to apologise but, if you choose to use gibberish, don't be surprised if peeps ask what on earth you are trying to say. Using it like that does say a lot about you though.

It makes a change to have a signature flame rather than a spelling flame or grammar flame to distract from the point at issue.

 

[Recycler]

The problems with second hand helmets is pointed out and you immediately conclude that the child should not wear a new one?

Could you explain the logic, as it is yet another complete distortion of what has actually been posted!

there is no need for me to explain the logic of something which I simply have not said. I don't know how you are able to come to that conclusion.
I agree; you have completely distorted my comments.

 

[Norm]

It obviously hasn't occured to you that NOT giving the helmet could be a fatal thing to do.

On the contrary, I often consider both sides of a discussion and such things do occur to me. You should try it some time, you might be pleasantly surprised. It just might help you look around the blinkers which lead you to ignore the sizing issues whilst rattling on about the condition of the helmet and Accy's personal hygiene. If a helmet is too large or too small, the wearer won't care too much about sharing body fluids or flakes of skin if they do have an accident.

See... I'm actually in favour of helmets. And one of those who you claim to be posting "hatred" about them also wears one. Again, that's the sort of insight which you might gain for yourself without the prejudicial blinkers.

So, as I said, with a bit of thought (which Accy might well have given anyway, without your irrational / emotional intervention), gifting a helmet to someone and checking that it fits and they know how to wear it is considerably better than just handing it over and thinking everything will be wonderful.

there is no need for me to explain the logic of something which I simply have not said.

Are you now suggesting that you didn't write:

Why are you so keen that a kid doesn't have a helmet on his head?

 

[Recycler]

Are you now suggesting that you didn't write:

Ugh? That has nothing to do with what Cunny was on about.
Perhaps you two should coordinate what you are saying?

 

[Norm]

Ugh? That has nothing to do with what Cunny was on about.
Perhaps you two should coordinate what you are saying?

Really? He even quoted that above but, still, if your continued difficulty reading what others have put lets you avoid the issue of badly fitting helmets, then at least it won't weigh too heavily on your shoulders. Unlike a helmet.

 

[Recycler]

Gosh. Accy really should be reported for child abuse. His selfish gift of a helmet to a youngster who couldn't afford one has not only given the kid some unspeakable diseases but has certainly caused his death at least five times over. Shocking.

 

[Norm]

That's not exactly what we've been suggesting. Is English your first language?

 

[ufkacbln]

there is no need for me to explain the logic of something which I simply have not said. I don't know how you are able to come to that conclusion.
I agree; you have completely distorted my comments.

OK we accept that this was posted by an impster and you did not actually ask

A

Why are you so keen that a kid doesn't have a helmet on his head?

My apologies for mistaking you for the person who sneaked in, posted this on your account and then ran away.

I fully accept that you did not pot this and therefore asking you to explain how you reached this conclusion was totally unreasonable

 

[Recycler]

I fully accept that you did not pot this

????

 

[ufkacbln]

That's not exactly what we've been suggesting. Is English your first language?

It appears that it is not............................

Ugh? That has nothing to do with what Cunny was on about.

I am assuming that on the present evidence that the English Language is not something that he is overly familiar with, or the fact that he is using obscenities in his posts!

You really couldn't have made this up!

 

[ufkacbln]

????

Lets make this very simple....... Someone posted :

A
Why are you so keen that a kid doesn't have a helmet on his head?

I then asked if you could explain you had come to this conclusion

The problems with second hand helmets is pointed out and you immediately conclude that the child should not wear a new one?

Could you explain the logic, as it is yet another complete distortion of what has actually been posted!

Your reply was:

there is no need for me to explain the logic of something which I simply have not said. I don't know how you are able to come to that conclusion.
I agree; you have completely distorted my comments.

I have therefore accepted at face value your claim that you simply have not said:

A
Why are you so keen that a kid doesn't have a helmet on his head?

.. or of course you could agree that this was your post and explain why you came to the conclusion that anyone ws keen for the kid not to wear a helmet?

 

[Recycler]

Gosh.
What a waste of time.

 

[ufkacbln]

Gosh.
What a waste of time.

So you are adamant you are not going to explain?


What about the use of obscenities or are you going to avoid that one as well?

 

[Red Light]

So you are adamant you are not going to explain?

Why explain when you signature flame and spelling flame instead?

 

[Norm]

Gosh.
What a waste of time.

Given that you've used your lack of comprehension to avoid the one question...

there is no need for me to explain the logic of something which I simply have not said. I don't know how you are able to come to that conclusion.

... or maybe two questions...

Ugh? That has nothing to do with what Cunny was on about.
Perhaps you two should coordinate what you are saying?

... then yes, we can at least agree that you are wasting our time.