John the Monkey said:As Cunobelin said, the best thing to do would be to publish the paperwork.
I do find it odd that WADA are so cagey about this - I'm sure they've slapped sanctions on people for being late to testing, a situation not entirely dissimilar.
IMHO it boils down to the conduct of the test.
If LA asked permission of the tester and the latter did in fact allow a shower then there is no case to answer. The conduct of the test has complied with the tester completely
If the tester did allow LA to leave the room without querying it then there is some doubt in the conduct of the tester and LA and it would be difficult to opportion blame
If the tester did not allow the shower and / or LA was told not to then LA is totally and unequivocally guilty of the charges
This is where the question is for me. LA was not late, did not refuse the test and it is the actual conduct of the test that is the problem. Guilt and Censure will be dependent on the above questions being answered.