Lance the Francophile

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Chuffy said:
Which is surely a fundamental principal of testing...

The fundamental principle of testing is to assume anyone with a rucksack is a burglar or vagrant attempting to gain entry, bop them on the nose and sit on them until the police arrive to confirm they are who they say they are. That way you stay in sight and no-one wants to volunteer to do it again ;)
 
Crackle said:
The fundamental principle of testing is to assume anyone with a rucksack is a burglar or vagrant attempting to gain entry, bop them on the nose and sit on them until the police arrive to confirm they are who they say they are. That way you stay in sight and no-one wants to volunteer to do it again ;)
Hush, you'll give him ideas. :becool:
 

Noodley

Guest
Dayvo said:
I agree with Keith! :tongue:

And not Noodley! :becool:

;)

Armstrong will have got the media interested in the story and his version of events made known to try to discredit any possible sanctions which could result. We'll find out the true story soon enough....
 
So much spin it really is hard to see what his aims are. Maybe he doesn't want to compete in the Tour but he wants someone else to make that decision for him, this might do nicely or why else contravene a rule he must clearly know.

Maybe the crash was deliberate too as he knows he's got no chance in the Giro. Nah, surely not.

After dancing about on the fence I'm rapidly reaching the conclusion that his return is not good (watch someone quote that bit ;)).
 

Noodley

Guest
Going back to the article quoted in the OP I thought it was a bit of a 'change' of words for him to state "I do not use any prohibited drugs or substances" rather than he has never tested positive, which has been his general stance when asked to comment, or alternatively to state he has 'prepared' well.

I do not think he is currently using PEDs, but he will take every opportunity presented to try to highlight how he is 'picked on' just to ensure his media persona remains that of the wronged hero and to protect his image.
 
The first article was a bit crap but I also noticed that.

Why is the Giro changing route. Is that to accommodate him or is there another reason?
 

Noodley

Guest
Crackle said:
Is that to accommodate him or is there another reason?

No, I don't think so as it was only to pass through France rather than stopping.....I think. Even I would not go that far with conspiracy theories ;):blush:
 

mondobongo

Über Member
Now being reported on Cycling News that AFLD accoring to L'Equipe will make a decision as to whether to open proceedings in early May. Why a delay of a month?
 
Of course there is an esy answer - publish the paperwork!

If the tester (as claimed) gave permission and signed the form that no anomalies occurredthan it is clearlythe tester that is at fault, and failed to keep to the rules
 
Top Bottom