Inconsistencies or plot holes in films

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
I know, why create a character who wears glasses only to cast someone who doesn't so you need to fake it...?. Either not bother cast a spectacle wearer.

So only glasses wearers can play people who wear glasses

next you'll be saying a black actress can;t play Anne Boleyn!!!

or a human can't play a Vulcan :ohmy:
 

figbat

Slippery scientist
I always wondered why, when non-glasses actors are cast with glasses, they make them with flat lenses which are so obviously non-correcting? Why not make gently curved lenses (but not optically-correcting) to at least avoid the give-away reflections of flat lenses?
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
I always wondered why, when non-glasses actors are cast with glasses, they make them with flat lenses which are so obviously non-correcting? Why not make gently curved lenses (but not optically-correcting) to at least avoid the give-away reflections of flat lenses?

Presumably you wouldn't allow glasses wearing actors to play people with good sight either.
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
They wouldn't be able to see without them?

If their eyesight is so bad they can't act without correction, they will need to wear contact lenses. Though TBH, I think there are relatively few roles where eyesight plays a significant part, so it won't often matter whether glasses are worn, excepting historical roles where modern glasses would be anachronistic.
 
They wouldn't be able to see without them?

Most movies consist of actors shot against green backgrounds grimacing against imaginary dragon/alien/dinosaur/superhero.

They act like they can see stuff but in practice they are following a tennis ball on a stick.
 

captain nemo1701

Space cadet. Deck 42 Main Engineering.
Location
Bristol
So only glasses wearers can play people who wear glasses

next you'll be saying a black actress can;t play Anne Boleyn!!!

or a human can't play a Vulcan :ohmy:

I don't think they should bother if its not central to the character like, Velma in Scooby Doo was always losing hers....usually at the feet of the ghost/monster etc.
 

captain nemo1701

Space cadet. Deck 42 Main Engineering.
Location
Bristol
Most movies consist of actors shot against green backgrounds grimacing against imaginary dragon/alien/dinosaur/superhero.

They act like they can see stuff but in practice they are following a tennis ball on a stick.

Star Trek Strange New Worlds uses a wall of up to 100 LED screens working together to create backgrounds with real images, rather than tedious blue/green screen:
video wall FX
It covers part of the ceiling & panels can be blank white for lighting.
 
It also messes up Colombo

Columbo had 2 perfectly good eyes - but Peter Falk had a glass eye and therefore should not have been playing the part of a person who has good vision!

I saw Frank Skinner going on about how he and someone - possibly David Baddiel - had long discussions about whether or not COlumbo had two good eye - and if so was Falk's good eye playing the part of a good eye
 

captain nemo1701

Space cadet. Deck 42 Main Engineering.
Location
Bristol
Does anyone know (I have not read the books) exactly why Harry Potter needs specs?. Is it integral to the story or his character?. Probably not, so why have him wear them if it means you need to fake them in movies?. And can't he say he's just wearing contacts?.
Might save the props dept some cash....
 
Top Bottom