KneesUp
Guru
Requiring?Well intentioned but requiring dishonesty, how does that sit?
Requiring?Well intentioned but requiring dishonesty, how does that sit?
You said "grubby"She's ripped the scene of a fatality off the internet. She's hijacked a man's death to bolster her helmet campaign. That's pretty despicable. You reckon a plastic hat protects against tipper trucks in Singapore?
Expanding your range of film stars you are looky likey to?
View: http://youtu.be/dG9tuuznL1Y[/QUOTE]
I will bring a vast supply of boiled eggs to Felpham.......and you will eat every last one.....
BTW, I leave the stomach massaging to others....
Right, so what's the view that does stack up? If I asked you "Is it possible that a helmet could prevent or reduce injury in a cycling accident?" what would you say?Yes, requiring. As in the argument failing to stack up, so resorting to false representation in order to make it a bit more compelling.
It's a pretty good indicator of "her" honesty and credibility, isn't it?You said "grubby"
What has the country got to do with it?
I imagine that one accident scene looks much like another - a road with blood on it. I also doubt she takes pictures of the scenes she attends as she has more important things to do.
Are you the poster on her blog who is assuming offence on behalf of the family of a dead man in order to try and make a point I'm not clear on?It's a pretty good indicator of "her" honesty and credibility, isn't it?
I think the use of stock images is quite common. I don't think it indicates much about her honesty or credibility.It's a pretty good indicator of "her" honesty and credibility, isn't it?
What are the other issues?If you were to search the relevant part of the forum, you could find out quite easily. The bottom line is that a helmet may prevent or reduce some injuries in some collisions. That has then to be counterbalanced by other issues though.
FFS. Errh.....no. What's your point?Are you the poster on her blog who is assuming offence on behalf of the family of a dead man in order to try and make a point I'm not clear on?
"Can you please show some dignity for a dead man and remove the scene of Li Jinwei's death? It has nothing to do with your dishonest campaign and is offensive to any of his family who may find this page by doing an image search." -
I get the impression someone posting on here is also posting on her blog, given the similarity of timings and the points being made. Apologies for thinking it was you.FFS. Errh.....no. What's your point?
Ah it's you who thinks you can speak on behalf of the family of the gentleman killed in the accident scene shown on her blog?"She's" now refusing to remove the advice about shouting at cyclists cos she thinks I've been rude to her.
So, cos her feelings are hurt she's leaving dangerously irresponsible instructions up on her worthless bullshit blog. This isn't a paramedic at all, it's a silly person.
Not really no. I imagine all accident scenes are similar. And like you I expect there are certain accidents that a helmet will help with, and if I were to have one of those certain accidents wearing my helmet and it means I get to carry on living, then that's all good. If it's not 'that kind of accident' I might die and the helmet will make bog all difference. In the former case I 'win' by wearing it, and in the latter I break even. Seems a no-brainer to me.Feeling lied to now?