glenn forger
Guest
I asked you a question.
I asked you first. You ignored it because you know there is no way on God's earth a real paramedic would recommend shouting at cyclists, it's just absurd.
I asked you a question.
Do I?
You disagree with the evidence that helmets greatly increase the risk of rotational injuries that could snap your spine?
He'll be needing a helmet if he's pissed, won't he?Do I?
As I am unaware of this evidence I have no view on it. Perhaps you could enlighten me and we could talk about it rather than staggering around the thread like a drunk looking for a fight at closing time?
So just to confirm. You are happy to use a device that has little or no proven efficacy in the belief that it might help, but will dismiss a 14% disbenefit because it's not fully explained. Correct?
It was an assumption I'd made based on no-one saying it in the thread.So when you said "a helmet wan't make things worse" you meant "I haven't actually researched it"?
Do you find that being rude to people you disagree with - rather than explaining why you hold a different view - is an effective way of winning them over?The "paramedic" blogger didn't deserve that courtesy.
I don't like being rude to people. Could you elaborate?Do you find that being rude to people you disagree with - rather than explaining why you hold a different view - is an effective way of winning them over?
Or do you just like being rude to people?
I guess the problem with blogs such as hat is that when you get past all the emotive language, it doesn't address the fact that helmets do not offer protection from the kind of collision described within. So the outcome will have been similar, helmet or not.
I think its very difficult when health professionals step into this debate, because whilst the may well be experts in treating head injuries, they will probably have no knowledge around head injury prevention, helmet efficacy etc, but they present their ill informed views as professional opinion.
There are about 300,000 injuries per year as a result of falling down stairs, and about 19,500 to do with cycling.
Given that, at a converative guess, 95% of the population use stairs at least twice a day, whereas only 10% of adults cycle at least once per month, I'd suggest that the risk of injury per ride is significantly higher than the risk per go on the stairs. And when those injuries do happen I'd suggest they are more likely to be serious.