Cycle helmets are designed and tested to offer some protection in low speed impacts.
I don't agree that they are designed for falling off a stationary bike, what would be the point of that?
I assume that you mean that a standard cycle helmet is no good at all at speeds of 25mph? How do you know if they are not tested under those conditions?
Why do you think helmets aren't tested at higher speeds? Don't you think the manufacturers would jump at the chance to market them as a major contribution to cycling safety if they could?
Me too, but I always land on my bum. Can't wear a helmet on your bum, though OH has suggested kevlar trousers (seriously) since we both gt nasty leg grazes when we had crashes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.