RichardB
Slightly retro
- Location
- West Wales
Me too. It seems like the end of an era - an era when cars were machines that were built by people rather then robots, could be understood and fixed with a few basic skills, and could be repaired ad infinitum. I have read somewhere that when you take the cost of materials and final disposal into account (sort of dust-to-dust measurement), then Land Rovers had a much lower environmental footprint than most normal cars, simply because you could repair them easily and the resource cost of building them was long in the past. To scrap a serviceable Land Rover and replace it with a new car made of freshly-mined metals and new plastics seems like environmental madness, even if the old Landy chucked out a bit more CO2 than the eurobox. I understand the world has moved on, but I can still shed a small tear for the loss of something with integrity and character.
Says more about my age than anything else - but still gutted.
At work we run a 110 SW and a 130 crew cab, and we also have a Ford Ranger pickup. The Ranger is a decent vehicle, comfy, warm and reliable, and the two Landies are forever breaking down and going offsite for repair, but if there is a choice, guess which one most of the boys opt for? Clue: it's not the Ford.