Simon Yates would disagree, and would be correct in doing sosaying its not my fault, cause someone else was supposed to manage it for me, doesn't really cut it
Smutchin is correct, and not an 'anti Wiggins warrior', in any case. You're behaving childishly and rudely.the same as all your posts about wiggins was boring, but you still kept making them..................another anti wiggo warrior whos had egg thrown in his face
were have i been rude..............and as i am pro wiggo, i have no need to schlapp him with schtickSmutchin is correct, and not an 'anti Wiggins warrior', in any case. You're behaving childishly and rudely.
On a day that Froome is headline news can you not give your Wiggins schtick a rest please?
Yes, it's failed, see Part 14 Article 2 of the UCI Regs, where "whereabouts failure" is listed as a way to fail a doping test, just below using prohibited substances and refusing to provide a sample. It's just a different way to fail, with lesser sanction.However, a report in the Daily Mail on Fridayhas now alleged that the 36-year-old, who is set to retire after next month’s Six Days of Ghent race, provided insufficient information about where he would be after returning from the Tour of California. According to the report, Wiggins blamed the time difference and the fact it was an overnight flight but the incident was still marked down as a missed test - NOT A FAILED TEST
Pardon?were have i been rude..............and as i am pro wiggo, i have no need to schlapp him with schtick
Can we ask Gianni Moscon?Let's say he does get a ban, which seems entirely possible going on precedent. Let's also imagine that he's free to compete in next year's Tour. Again, seems a reasonably possible outcome.
Where does this leave Sky's zero tolerance policy? Will he be out on his ear?
i don't set test's or police anything.....so you'll have nothing to fail on. i'm only posting what was quoted within the article you referred to in your post..........Yes, it's failed, see Part 14 Article 2 of the UCI Regs, where "whereabouts failure" is listed as a way to fail a doping test, just below using prohibited substances and refusing to provide a sample. It's just a different way to fail, with lesser sanction.
I look forward to taking tests set by the jowwy exam board, where not showing up is accepted as a way to pass, but I'm a bit worried about the jowwy roads policing unit and how only the truly stupid will fail its drink or drugs tests!
I don't see the bit in capitals in it. "Missed" is a type of "failed" for required tests.i don't set test's or police anything.....so you'll have nothing to fail on. i'm only posting what was quoted within the article you referred to in your post..........
or maybe we should ask Jonathon tiernan lockeCan we ask Gianni Moscon?
However, a report in the Daily Mail on Fridayhas now alleged that the 36-year-old, who is set to retire after next month’s Six Days of Ghent race, provided insufficient information about where he would be after returning from the Tour of California. According to the report, Wiggins blamed the time difference and the fact it was an overnight flight but the incident was still marked down as a missed testI don't see the bit in capitals in it. "Missed" is a type of "failed" for required tests.
Yes, which the UCI Regs says is a type of failed, don't they?i bolded, italic and underlined the papers quote of MISSED
they may well do, but this is no longer about wiggins as people have already stated in a few posts above..................its about froome and his failed dope test.Yes, which the UCI Regs says is a type of failed, don't they?