Failed Disc

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Location
Loch side.
Some people are their own worst enemies. Alloing a disc to get that thin is pure...let's say, something that sounds like liquidity.

That disc is probably 0.3mm thick, way, way way beyond the acceptable level. I'm pretty certain that bike has three or four other death traps too.
 

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Looks very thin; and possibly also of sandwich format with an ally centre between two steel wear faces.

It does look like the swept area of the pads impinges on the arms at their ends, but I'm not sure if this was the primary failure mode. Thinking about how the forces act on the disc under braking (torque subjecting the disc to compression as it rotates into the restraint provided by the caliper and tension after it exits) I reckon the whole thing probably just got too thin, lost stiffness and buckled before it entered the caliper.

As for the swept areas of the arms; this would have to be a mis-alignment or manufacturing issue rather than sizing since they step up in 20mm increments on the OD, so the incorrect size would be very obvious.
 
OP
OP
Marchrider

Marchrider

Über Member
It looks like the caliper was set incorrectly so the pads wore the bit where it snapped,

They do. Most commonly 140 or 160mm for road bikes, often larger for mountain bikes.

If you fit the wrong size, it either won't go into the caliper at all, or you may need to change the caliper bolts. It may be possible to fit a larger one without adjusting the calipers and have them catching the wrong place.

But the noise & vibration if the pads aren't pulling against the correct surface would be intolerable, would have thought, so that sounds unlikely.

OK, I put it to him the disc could be the wrong size, and here is the return email

When I was measuring the thickness of the old disc, I noticed it said “180 mm” on it … but the new one is 160 mm, and indeed is the one on my rear wheel (as per my spreadsheet). I now think that when I bought a new front wheel from a shop here in Munich (may 24) which came with a disc brake attached that the guy in the shop had sorted out for me, that I hadn’t realised the disc was a different diameter and I’ve been, indeed, using a 180 mm when I should have been using 160 mm. I never noticed.
I'm struggling to believe this was not obvious with some sort of knocking noise, when braking - he will of undoubtedly done a huge mileage since last may, it is his main transport and does massive tours - visits me from Munich 1000+miles away on his bike, knocks out 120-150mile day in day out sort of nonsense. - it couldn't have been that obvious riding, he would have known, but it should have been visually, but then he's not into mechanics and maintenance in the same way i am.

oh, and he had measure the thickness of the failed one at between 1.1 and 1.3 , the new one is 1.6 with a min thickness of 1.5 shown.

I think he has dodged a bullet wit this
 

si_c

Guru
Location
Wirral
do these discs come in different diameters ? could the wrong on have been fitted ?
(I know nothing about these discs, my bikes are on rims)



I have one of these for checking my rims

The disc is the right diameter, it's just way way way past the point it should have been replaced - the fact that the metal of the disc has folded like a bit of tape is a clear indicator.

I check mine periodically for thickness, 1.2mm is the thinnest I've ever been, I'd be surprised if that was even 0.5mm.
 
OP
OP
Marchrider

Marchrider

Über Member
The disc is the right diameter, it's just way way way past the point it should have been replaced - the fact that the metal of the disc has folded like a bit of tape is a clear indicator.

I check mine periodically for thickness, 1.2mm is the thinnest I've ever been, I'd be surprised if that was even 0.5mm.

did you read the post above ? #19
 

silva

Über Member
Location
Belgium
Lol it's like wearing shoe soles until walking bare feet like in the Flintstones.
 
Top Bottom