Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
Not a link,more of a direction to their page.Yes, I will point it out to my procurement officer (wife) later.
Not a link,more of a direction to their page.Yes, I will point it out to my procurement officer (wife) later.
We're being told that if you can't wear a mask for medical reasons,you shouldn't ask your GP for an exemption certificate. Instead you should argue your case with those who will try and stop you entering a shop,or those who will fine you(police)for not wearing one. If you do end up being fined you can then argue your case in court,either in person or by letter. What happens if you argue your case and you win,yet end up being fined again? Do we repeat the whole process over and over again? I'm going to carry a mask,but not wear it all the time due to medical reasons. I'm expecting to be one of those who'll either be fined,or frowned upon by those who comply with every government order. Oh,and i wish the government would advise...even order people to not drop worn face masks after they've done with them,but to dispose of them correctly/hygienically. I see these blue surgical masks dropped in supermarket car parks,even a hospital car park the other day and wonder if those dropping them are the same ones who bleat on about how we should all be forced to wear them to 'stop the spread of the virus'.
Personally, I'll just wear some form a face covering. Staff in shops have worked hard and in a vulnerable, yet essential role, they don't need me making their life harder. Plus, having vulnerable family members, I wouldn't want to think I played a part in making someone else's condition worse.
Where I have an issue, is that it effectively stigmatizes some people who also have enough issues at the moment, as it forces people with underlying conditions to be publicly identifiable, or to stay indoors and lose a bit of independence. I get the argument that they should be the ones taking precautions, I would expect the majority do, but there will be some that can do that without having to explain themselves if they need a loaf of bread.
I have no idea what the solution to that is, or if it's really even an issue. I just thought I'd float it out there.
^^^^ yebbut how do you see out?
'Won't somebody think of the autistics?', the rallying cry of libertarian whackjobs everywhere. It's not exactly new though, using autistic people to further an anti-science, conspiracy theory agenda.Personally, I'll just wear some form a face covering. Staff in shops have worked hard and in a vulnerable, yet essential role, they don't need me making their life harder. Plus, having vulnerable family members, I wouldn't want to think I played a part in making someone else's condition worse.
Where I have an issue, is that it effectively stigmatizes some people who also have enough issues at the moment, as it forces people with underlying conditions to be publicly identifiable, or to stay indoors and lose a bit of independence. I get the argument that they should be the ones taking precautions, I would expect the majority do, but there will be some that can do that without having to explain themselves if they need a loaf of bread.
I have no idea what the solution to that is, or if it's really even an issue. I just thought I'd float it out there.
It's unworkable, silly & convoluted nonsense, the wearing of masks are we are being told to do, it's not about masks per se. If it was mandatory mask wearing outside of your home, I would understand it, if not believe in it. But it's not, it is lunacy.
Blue trimmed headwear and pink mask!Threatening this look for my holidays.
View attachment 537101
Yaasss!!Blue trimmed headwear and pink mask!