Pale Rider
Legendary Member
A bit like recognising that you're not "stuck in traffic", you are the traffic.
I have always known it's not my car that causes jams, it's all the others.
A bit like recognising that you're not "stuck in traffic", you are the traffic.
The fuel story is a huge story, thus at the minute the media want every dot and comma.
Those blaming the media in some may might do well to consider this thread.
It must be the fastest moving and best viewed thread on CC this year, and arguably has made its own small contribution to the general nervousness over fuel supply.
I'm not criticising anyone for posting on here, but let's not pretend it's the media, social or otherwise, which is causing the problem.
The vast majority of us remain obsessively attached to our cars, and any attempt to weaken that attachment is vigorously resisted.
To be fair, this covers just about all private motoring.we should all follow a moral instruction that he calls “the categorical imperative”, telling us that we should not do things that do not make sense if everyone did them. To act in a way that forces others to be irrational is, in itself, irrational. It is an affront to the dignity of the human being.
No need to pretend - it IS the media causing the problem.
That would be fine as an argument if the media were reporting what you say. But every bit of media I've seen or heard has put out the message that there is no shortage of fuel and that panic buying is making things worse (look at all the broadsheet headlines today, for example). So I think your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny - perhaps we need to look elsewhere for the blame.No need to pretend - it IS the media causing the problem. Very few fuel stations have actually run out, in spite of long queues all the time since about last Thursday.
Those queues have occurred because people think there is going to be a shortage, and they only think that because of the media stories.
This is very true, but I don't think is the cause of the queues.
That would be fine as an argument if the media were reporting what you say. But every bit of media I've seen or heard has put out the message that there is no shortage of fuel and that panic buying is making things worse (looks at all the broadsheet headlines today, for example). So I think your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny - perhaps we need to look elsewhere for the blame.
The pesky media buying all the petrol...
I'm not sure the evidence supports this either - but don't forget, the media isn't just the tabloids - it includes the broadsheets, radio, TV, and web.Yes in many cases the media explain that in the text, under a big photo of an enormous queue or a closed forecourt. Guess which of those two messages is received most strongly?
Yes in many cases the media explain that in the text, under a big photo of an enormous queue or a closed forecourt. Guess which of those two messages is received most strongly?
What photo would you suggest they use to illustrate a story about panic buying of fuel?
A landscape of the Serengeti?
Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plain?
What photo would you suggest they use to illustrate a story about panic buying of fuel?
A landscape of the Serengeti?
Perhaps not every story needs a photo.What photo would you suggest they use to illustrate a story about panic buying of fuel?
A landscape of the Serengeti?
Accepted. Nevertheless, the net message of a photo indicating shortages plus text not indicating shortages is - shortages.
Perhaps not every story needs a photo.